Platform and aggregator rather than a model trainer — their Prism model is a fine-tuned Tripo, plus they offer Hunyuan 3.0, Meshy, and more on the same platform. Probably the biggest AI studio available, covering image generation, editing, and extensive 3D tools all in one place.
Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Studio · AI Texturing · Image · Commercial Use · AI Rigging · Split into Parts
Platform and aggregator rather than a model trainer — their Prism model is a fine-tuned Tripo, plus they offer Hunyuan 3.0, Meshy, and more on the same platform. Probably the biggest AI studio available, covering image generation, editing, and extensive 3D tools all in one place.
Prism (3D AI Studio) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Follow Prism (3D AI Studio) on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @3DAIStudioCommunity rating · out of 5
Community rating
24 ratings · 5 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#20 / 23
Textured ELO
961
Geometry ELO
992
Win Rate
46%
957 wins · 1,110 losses
Total: 2,067 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.20
Typical runtime: 5.8 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#19 · 962 ELO
In December 25, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (961 ELO), compared with #19 (962 ELO) for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D holds a 1 point advantage, so Forge v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Forge v2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 41% for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D often returns meshes quicker (55s) while Forge v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#21 · 947 ELO
In December 25, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (961 ELO), compared with #21 (947 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Forge v2.0 maintains a 14 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Forge v2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 39% for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Forge v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#18 · 966 ELO
In December 25, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (961 ELO), compared with #18 (966 ELO) for Meshy 5.
Meshy 5 holds a 5 point advantage, so Forge v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Forge v2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for Meshy 5.
Meshy 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Forge v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#22 · 917 ELO
In December 25, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (961 ELO), compared with #22 (917 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2.
Forge v2.0 maintains a 44 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Forge v2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 40% for Sloyd AI v2.
Sloyd AI v2 often returns meshes quicker (1.3 min) while Forge v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for Forge v2.0 in December 25?
In December 25, Forge v2.0 finished at #20 with 961 ELO and 2,067 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with Forge v2.0?
Forge v2.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.20 per test with a typical runtime of 5.8 min.
How did Forge v2.0 compare with SAM 3D in December 25?
In December 25, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (961 ELO), compared with #19 (962 ELO) for SAM 3D. SAM 3D holds a 1 point advantage, so Forge v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, Forge v2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 41% for SAM 3D. SAM 3D often returns meshes quicker (55s) while Forge v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
