4K Texture · Polycount Control · Free · Commercial Use
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
YVO3D · 3 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 3
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
63% win rate · 397 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
38 ratings · 7 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#17 / 23
Textured ELO
980
Geometry ELO
871
Win Rate
43%
893 wins · 1,168 losses
Total: 2,061 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.80
Typical runtime: 3.7 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#16 · 981 ELO
In December 25, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #17 (980 ELO), compared with #16 (981 ELO) for Prism v2.5.
Prism v2.5 holds a 1 point advantage, so YVO3D 1.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for Prism v2.5.
Prism v2.5 often returns meshes quicker (3.3 min) while YVO3D 1.0 focuses on fidelity.
#18 · 966 ELO
In December 25, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #17 (980 ELO), compared with #18 (966 ELO) for Meshy 5.
YVO3D 1.0 maintains a 14 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for Meshy 5.
Meshy 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while YVO3D 1.0 focuses on fidelity.
#15 · 981 ELO
In December 25, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #17 (980 ELO), compared with #15 (981 ELO) for Seed3D v1.0.
Seed3D v1.0 holds a 1 point advantage, so YVO3D 1.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 48% for Seed3D v1.0.
YVO3D 1.0 also tends to finish generations faster (3.7 min vs 5.8 min).
#19 · 962 ELO
In December 25, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #17 (980 ELO), compared with #19 (962 ELO) for SAM 3D.
YVO3D 1.0 maintains a 18 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 41% for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D often returns meshes quicker (55s) while YVO3D 1.0 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for YVO3D 1.0 in December 25?
In December 25, YVO3D 1.0 finished at #17 with 980 ELO and 2,061 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with YVO3D 1.0?
YVO3D 1.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.80 per test with a typical runtime of 3.7 min.
How did YVO3D 1.0 compare with Prism v2.5 in December 25?
In December 25, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #17 (980 ELO), compared with #16 (981 ELO) for Prism v2.5. Prism v2.5 holds a 1 point advantage, so YVO3D 1.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for Prism v2.5. Prism v2.5 often returns meshes quicker (3.3 min) while YVO3D 1.0 focuses on fidelity.
