Image · 4K Texture · Commercial Use
AI 3D generator from a team with roots at Meta, Google, Canva, and Magic Leap. Offers High-Res (500K+ polygons), Low-Poly, and Ultra High-Res (2M polygons) modes — all with 4K textures. Image-to-3D only, no multiview support. Affordable per-generation pricing but slower generation times.
AI 3D generator from a team with roots at Meta, Google, Canva, and Magic Leap. Offers High-Res (500K+ polygons), Low-Poly, and Ultra High-Res (2M polygons) modes — all with 4K textures. Image-to-3D only, no multiview support. Affordable per-generation pricing but slower generation times.
68% win rate · 19 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
3 ratings · 1 written review
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#2 / 7
Segmentation ELO
1005
Total votes
5
Win Rate
60%
3 wins · 2 losses
Total: 5 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.43
Typical runtime: 3.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#1 · 1023 ELO
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #2 (1005 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter currently sits at #1 (1023 ELO).
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter holds a 18 point advantage, so Alpha3D 5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Alpha3D 5 wins about 60% of its judged matches overall, compared to 86% for Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter.
Alpha3D 5 also tends to finish generations faster (3.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#3 · 1005 ELO
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #2 (1005 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1005 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Alpha3D 5 wins about 60% of its judged matches overall, compared to 57% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Alpha3D 5 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1000 ELO
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #2 (1005 ELO) while Tripo Segmentation v2.1 currently sits at #4 (1000 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 maintains a 5 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Alpha3D 5 wins about 60% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Tripo Segmentation v2.1.
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Alpha3D 5 focuses on fidelity.
#5 · 991 ELO
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #2 (1005 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #5 (991 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 maintains a 14 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Alpha3D 5 wins about 60% of its judged matches overall, compared to 33% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Alpha3D 5?
Alpha3D 5 is sitting at #2 with an arena ELO of 1005. It has participated in 5 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Alpha3D 5?
Alpha3D 5 reports an average generation cost of $0.43 per test with a typical runtime of 3.0 min.
When should I choose Alpha3D 5 over Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter?
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #2 (1005 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter currently sits at #1 (1023 ELO). Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter holds a 18 point advantage, so Alpha3D 5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Alpha3D 5 wins about 60% of its judged matches overall, compared to 86% for Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter. Alpha3D 5 also tends to finish generations faster (3.0 min vs 8.0 min).
