Image · 4K Texture · Commercial Use
AI 3D generator from a team with roots at Meta, Google, Canva, and Magic Leap. Offers High-Res (500K+ polygons), Low-Poly, and Ultra High-Res (2M polygons) modes — all with 4K textures. Image-to-3D only, no multiview support. Affordable per-generation pricing but slower generation times.
AI 3D generator from a team with roots at Meta, Google, Canva, and Magic Leap. Offers High-Res (500K+ polygons), Low-Poly, and Ultra High-Res (2M polygons) modes — all with 4K textures. Image-to-3D only, no multiview support. Affordable per-generation pricing but slower generation times.
55% win rate · 675 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
3 ratings · 1 written review
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#4 / 7
Segmentation ELO
1016
Total votes
126
Win Rate
51%
64 wins · 62 losses
Total: 126 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.43
Typical runtime: 3.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#3 · 1040 ELO
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #4 (1016 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1040 ELO).
Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 24 point advantage, so Alpha3D 5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Alpha3D 5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 62% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Alpha3D 5 focuses on fidelity.
#5 · 927 ELO
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #4 (1016 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #5 (927 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 maintains a 89 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Alpha3D 5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 35% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
#2 · 1054 ELO
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #4 (1016 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter currently sits at #2 (1054 ELO).
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter holds a 38 point advantage, so Alpha3D 5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Alpha3D 5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 64% for Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter.
Alpha3D 5 also tends to finish generations faster (3.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#6 · 925 ELO
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #4 (1016 ELO) while Rodin Gen-2.5 currently sits at #6 (925 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 maintains a 91 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Alpha3D 5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 38% for Rodin Gen-2.5.
Alpha3D 5 also tends to finish generations faster (3.0 min vs 6.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Alpha3D 5?
Alpha3D 5 is sitting at #4 with an arena ELO of 1016. It has participated in 126 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Alpha3D 5?
Alpha3D 5 reports an average generation cost of $0.43 per test with a typical runtime of 3.0 min.
When should I choose Alpha3D 5 over Meshy 6 Auto Split?
Alpha3D 5 is ranked #4 (1016 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1040 ELO). Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 24 point advantage, so Alpha3D 5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Alpha3D 5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 62% for Meshy 6 Auto Split. Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Alpha3D 5 focuses on fidelity.
