Image · Studio · Polycount Control
Autodesk is one of the largest software companies in the world, known for AutoCAD, Maya, 3ds Max, Fusion, and many other industry-standard tools. They've entered the AI 3D space with Wonder3D — a generative AI model for creating 3D assets. Backed by decades of 3D expertise and enterprise infrastructure.
Autodesk · 1 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 1
Autodesk is one of the largest software companies in the world, known for AutoCAD, Maya, 3ds Max, Fusion, and many other industry-standard tools. They've entered the AI 3D space with Wonder3D — a generative AI model for creating 3D assets. Backed by decades of 3D expertise and enterprise infrastructure.
22% win rate · 602 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
0 ratings · 0 written reviews
No reviews with comments yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#24 / 25
Textured ELO
864
Geometry ELO
866
Win Rate
34%
288 wins · 551 losses
Total: 839 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.23
Typical runtime: 4.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#23 · 871 ELO
In Jun 26, Wonder3D ranked #24 (864 ELO), compared with #23 (871 ELO) for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D holds a 7 point advantage, so Wonder3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Wonder3D won 34% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 37% for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D often returns meshes quicker (55s) while Wonder3D focuses on fidelity.
#25 · 857 ELO
In Jun 26, Wonder3D ranked #24 (864 ELO), compared with #25 (857 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Wonder3D maintains a 7 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Wonder3D won 34% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 33% for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Wonder3D focuses on fidelity.
#22 · 913 ELO
In Jun 26, Wonder3D ranked #24 (864 ELO), compared with #22 (913 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2.
Sloyd AI v2 holds a 49 point advantage, so Wonder3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Wonder3D won 34% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 40% for Sloyd AI v2.
Sloyd AI v2 often returns meshes quicker (1.3 min) while Wonder3D focuses on fidelity.
#21 · 931 ELO
In Jun 26, Wonder3D ranked #24 (864 ELO), compared with #21 (931 ELO) for Alpha3D 4.
Alpha3D 4 holds a 67 point advantage, so Wonder3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Wonder3D won 34% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 44% for Alpha3D 4.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for Wonder3D in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, Wonder3D finished at #24 with 864 ELO and 839 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with Wonder3D?
Wonder3D reports an average generation cost of $0.23 per test with a typical runtime of 4.0 min.
How did Wonder3D compare with SAM 3D in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, Wonder3D ranked #24 (864 ELO), compared with #23 (871 ELO) for SAM 3D. SAM 3D holds a 7 point advantage, so Wonder3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, Wonder3D won 34% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 37% for SAM 3D. SAM 3D often returns meshes quicker (55s) while Wonder3D focuses on fidelity.
