The open-source Hunyuan model you can deploy locally or use with ComfyUI. Arguably one of the best open-source 3D AI models available, on par with Meta SAM 3D and Hyper3D. Features poly count control, image-to-3D, and texturing — all free with full local control.
Polycount Control · Open Source · Free · ComfyUI · API
The open-source Hunyuan model you can deploy locally or use with ComfyUI. Arguably one of the best open-source 3D AI models available, on par with Meta SAM 3D and Hyper3D. Features poly count control, image-to-3D, and texturing — all free with full local control.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 (Comfy) · 1 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 1
Follow Hunyuan 3D v2.1 (Comfy) on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @TencentHunyuanCommunity rating · out of 5
Community rating
12 ratings · 3 written reviews
For me even if this was free the engine is not good. The models don't look good and the shape is not accurate. Also doesn't make good guesses on other parts of the model.
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#21 / 23
Textured ELO
947
Geometry ELO
893
Win Rate
39%
812 wins · 1,252 losses
Total: 2,064 votes
Average Generation Cost
Free (limited)
Typical runtime: 2.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#20 · 961 ELO
In December 25, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 ranked #21 (947 ELO), compared with #20 (961 ELO) for Forge v2.0.
Forge v2.0 holds a 14 point advantage, so Hunyuan 3D v2.1 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for Forge v2.0.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 also tends to finish generations faster (2.0 min vs 5.8 min).
#22 · 917 ELO
In December 25, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 ranked #21 (947 ELO), compared with #22 (917 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 maintains a 30 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 40% for Sloyd AI v2.
Sloyd AI v2 often returns meshes quicker (1.3 min) while Hunyuan 3D v2.1 focuses on fidelity.
#19 · 962 ELO
In December 25, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 ranked #21 (947 ELO), compared with #19 (962 ELO) for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D holds a 15 point advantage, so Hunyuan 3D v2.1 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 41% for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D often returns meshes quicker (55s) while Hunyuan 3D v2.1 focuses on fidelity.
#23 · 876 ELO
In December 25, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 ranked #21 (947 ELO), compared with #23 (876 ELO) for CSM AI.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 maintains a 71 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 39% for CSM AI.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 also tends to finish generations faster (2.0 min vs 4.0 min).
What was the Top 3D AI rank for Hunyuan 3D v2.1 in December 25?
In December 25, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 finished at #21 with 947 ELO and 2,064 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with Hunyuan 3D v2.1?
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 does not expose confirmed pricing data inside Arena mode yet, so costs vary by plan.
How did Hunyuan 3D v2.1 compare with Forge v2.0 in December 25?
In December 25, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 ranked #21 (947 ELO), compared with #20 (961 ELO) for Forge v2.0. Forge v2.0 holds a 14 point advantage, so Hunyuan 3D v2.1 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, Hunyuan 3D v2.1 won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for Forge v2.0. Hunyuan 3D v2.1 also tends to finish generations faster (2.0 min vs 5.8 min).
