4K Texture · Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Split into Parts · Image · Free · API · Commercial Use · ComfyUI
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Free exploration ($0); confirming results and some exports require paid credits. Plan details
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
60% win rate · 700 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
41 ratings · 16 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#6 / 10
Low Poly ELO
989
Total votes
274
Win Rate
51%
140 wins · 134 losses
Total: 274 votes
Average Generation Cost
$1.73
Typical runtime: 6.0 min
Nearby ranks in Low Poly
#5 · 1031 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #5 (1031 ELO).
YVO3D 2.5 holds a 42 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 58% for YVO3D 2.5.
YVO3D 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 971 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #7 (971 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 18 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1036 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while Tripo 3.1 Retopo currently sits at #4 (1036 ELO).
Tripo 3.1 Retopo holds a 47 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 54% for Tripo 3.1 Retopo.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo often returns meshes quicker (2.5 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#8 · 954 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while N4D-2.5 Retopo currently sits at #8 (954 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 35 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for N4D-2.5 Retopo.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 also tends to finish generations faster (6.0 min vs 7.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is sitting at #6 with an arena ELO of 989. It has participated in 274 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 reports an average generation cost of $1.73 per test with a typical runtime of 6.0 min.
When should I choose Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 over YVO3D 2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #5 (1031 ELO). YVO3D 2.5 holds a 42 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 58% for YVO3D 2.5. YVO3D 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
