4K Texture · Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Split into Parts · Image · Free · API · Commercial Use · ComfyUI
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2

Free exploration ($0); confirming results and some exports require paid credits. Plan details
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
50% win rate · 20 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
41 ratings · 16 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#5 / 7
Segmentation ELO
987
Total votes
11
Win Rate
36%
4 wins · 7 losses
Total: 11 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.87
Typical runtime: 6.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#4 · 1005 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #5 (987 ELO) while Tripo Segmentation v2.1 currently sits at #4 (1005 ELO).
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 holds a 18 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 67% for Tripo Segmentation v2.1.
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#6 · 986 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #5 (987 ELO) while Roblox CubePart currently sits at #6 (986 ELO).
Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 1 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 33% for Roblox CubePart.
Roblox CubePart often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#3 · 1005 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #5 (987 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1005 ELO).
Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 18 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 57% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 986 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #5 (987 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #7 (986 ELO).
Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 1 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 29% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Rodin Gen-2.5?
Rodin Gen-2.5 is sitting at #5 with an arena ELO of 987. It has participated in 11 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Rodin Gen-2.5?
Rodin Gen-2.5 reports an average generation cost of $0.87 per test with a typical runtime of 6.0 min.
When should I choose Rodin Gen-2.5 over Tripo Segmentation v2.1?
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #5 (987 ELO) while Tripo Segmentation v2.1 currently sits at #4 (1005 ELO). Tripo Segmentation v2.1 holds a 18 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 67% for Tripo Segmentation v2.1. Tripo Segmentation v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.