Free · Image · Commercial Use · API · Open Source · Split into Parts
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
SAM 3D (Meta) · 1 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 1
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
12% win rate · 706 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
13 ratings · 3 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#24 / 24
Textured ELO
843
Geometry ELO
852
Win Rate
35%
663 wins · 1,233 losses
Total: 1,896 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.02
Typical runtime: 55s
Nearby ranks in Textured
#23 · 868 ELO
In January 26, SAM 3D ranked #24 (843 ELO), compared with #23 (868 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2.
Sloyd AI v2 holds a 25 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, SAM 3D won 35% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 38% for Sloyd AI v2.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 1.3 min).
#22 · 880 ELO
In January 26, SAM 3D ranked #24 (843 ELO), compared with #22 (880 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 holds a 37 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, SAM 3D won 35% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 37% for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 2.0 min).
#21 · 902 ELO
In January 26, SAM 3D ranked #24 (843 ELO), compared with #21 (902 ELO) for YVO3D 1.0.
YVO3D 1.0 holds a 59 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, SAM 3D won 35% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 41% for YVO3D 1.0.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 3.7 min).
#20 · 923 ELO
In January 26, SAM 3D ranked #24 (843 ELO), compared with #20 (923 ELO) for Forge v2.0.
Forge v2.0 holds a 80 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, SAM 3D won 35% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 43% for Forge v2.0.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 5.8 min).
What was the Top 3D AI rank for SAM 3D in January 26?
In January 26, SAM 3D finished at #24 with 843 ELO and 1,896 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with SAM 3D?
SAM 3D reports an average generation cost of $0.02 per test with a typical runtime of 55s.
How did SAM 3D compare with Sloyd AI v2 in January 26?
In January 26, SAM 3D ranked #24 (843 ELO), compared with #23 (868 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2. Sloyd AI v2 holds a 25 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, SAM 3D won 35% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 38% for Sloyd AI v2. SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 1.3 min).
