Free · Image · Commercial Use · API · Open Source · Split into Parts
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
SAM 3D (Meta) · 1 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 1
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
12% win rate · 704 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
13 ratings · 3 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#23 / 25
Textured ELO
871
Geometry ELO
902
Win Rate
37%
282 wins · 485 losses
Total: 767 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.02
Typical runtime: 55s
Nearby ranks in Textured
#22 · 913 ELO
In Jun 26, SAM 3D ranked #23 (871 ELO), compared with #22 (913 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2.
Sloyd AI v2 holds a 42 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, SAM 3D won 37% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 40% for Sloyd AI v2.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 1.3 min).
#24 · 864 ELO
In Jun 26, SAM 3D ranked #23 (871 ELO), compared with #24 (864 ELO) for Wonder3D.
SAM 3D maintains a 7 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, SAM 3D won 37% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 34% for Wonder3D.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 4.0 min).
#21 · 931 ELO
In Jun 26, SAM 3D ranked #23 (871 ELO), compared with #21 (931 ELO) for Alpha3D 4.
Alpha3D 4 holds a 60 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, SAM 3D won 37% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 44% for Alpha3D 4.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 4.0 min).
#25 · 857 ELO
In Jun 26, SAM 3D ranked #23 (871 ELO), compared with #25 (857 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
SAM 3D maintains a 14 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, SAM 3D won 37% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 33% for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 2.0 min).
What was the Top 3D AI rank for SAM 3D in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, SAM 3D finished at #23 with 871 ELO and 767 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with SAM 3D?
SAM 3D reports an average generation cost of $0.02 per test with a typical runtime of 55s.
How did SAM 3D compare with Sloyd AI v2 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, SAM 3D ranked #23 (871 ELO), compared with #22 (913 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2. Sloyd AI v2 holds a 42 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, SAM 3D won 37% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 40% for Sloyd AI v2. SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 1.3 min).
