Image · API · Commercial Use · Polycount Control · AI Rigging
Built by DreamTech on their proprietary Direct3D-S2 architecture, Neural4D delivers high-fidelity 3D models with clean topology and PBR textures. Their N4D-2.5 model generates at 2K (2048³) spatial resolution in under 90 seconds — one of the fastest in the industry. Supports text-to-3D and image-to-3D with production-ready, 3D-print-ready output. API available at ~$0.15/generation. A strong newcomer worth watching.
Built by DreamTech on their proprietary Direct3D-S2 architecture, Neural4D delivers high-fidelity 3D models with clean topology and PBR textures. Their N4D-2.5 model generates at 2K (2048³) spatial resolution in under 90 seconds — one of the fastest in the industry. Supports text-to-3D and image-to-3D with production-ready, 3D-print-ready output. API available at ~$0.15/generation. A strong newcomer worth watching.
48% win rate · 588 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
4 ratings · 0 written reviews
No reviews with comments yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#8 / 10
Low Poly ELO
954
Total votes
400
Win Rate
43%
173 wins · 227 losses
Total: 400 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.32
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Nearby ranks in Low Poly
#7 · 971 ELO
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #8 (954 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #7 (971 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 holds a 17 point advantage, so N4D-2.5 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
#9 · 941 ELO
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #8 (954 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D Retopo currently sits at #9 (941 ELO).
N4D-2.5 Retopo maintains a 13 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 38% for Hunyuan 3D Retopo.
Hunyuan 3D Retopo often returns meshes quicker (5.0 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
#6 · 989 ELO
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #8 (954 ELO) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 currently sits at #6 (989 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 holds a 35 point advantage, so N4D-2.5 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 51% for Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 often returns meshes quicker (6.0 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
#10 · 888 ELO
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #8 (954 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 Artist Mesh currently sits at #10 (888 ELO).
N4D-2.5 Retopo maintains a 66 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 30% for Triverse 3.0 Artist Mesh.
Triverse 3.0 Artist Mesh often returns meshes quicker (1.0 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for N4D-2.5 Retopo?
N4D-2.5 Retopo is sitting at #8 with an arena ELO of 954. It has participated in 400 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with N4D-2.5 Retopo?
N4D-2.5 Retopo reports an average generation cost of $0.32 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
When should I choose N4D-2.5 Retopo over Alpha3D 5?
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #8 (954 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #7 (971 ELO). Alpha3D 5 holds a 17 point advantage, so N4D-2.5 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for Alpha3D 5. Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
