4K Texture · Polycount Control · Free · Commercial Use
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
YVO3D · 3 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 3
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1

First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
63% win rate · 398 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
38 ratings · 7 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#21 / 24
Textured ELO
902
Geometry ELO
835
Win Rate
41%
768 wins · 1,128 losses
Total: 1,896 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.80
Typical runtime: 3.7 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#20 · 923 ELO
In January 26, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #21 (902 ELO), compared with #20 (923 ELO) for Forge v2.0.
Forge v2.0 holds a 21 point advantage, so YVO3D 1.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 41% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 43% for Forge v2.0.
YVO3D 1.0 also tends to finish generations faster (3.7 min vs 5.8 min).
#22 · 880 ELO
In January 26, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #21 (902 ELO), compared with #22 (880 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
YVO3D 1.0 maintains a 22 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 41% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 37% for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while YVO3D 1.0 focuses on fidelity.
#19 · 950 ELO
In January 26, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #21 (902 ELO), compared with #19 (950 ELO) for Seed3D v1.0.
Seed3D v1.0 holds a 48 point advantage, so YVO3D 1.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 41% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 45% for Seed3D v1.0.
YVO3D 1.0 also tends to finish generations faster (3.7 min vs 5.8 min).
#23 · 868 ELO
In January 26, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #21 (902 ELO), compared with #23 (868 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2.
YVO3D 1.0 maintains a 34 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 41% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 38% for Sloyd AI v2.
Sloyd AI v2 often returns meshes quicker (1.3 min) while YVO3D 1.0 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for YVO3D 1.0 in January 26?
In January 26, YVO3D 1.0 finished at #21 with 902 ELO and 1,896 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with YVO3D 1.0?
YVO3D 1.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.80 per test with a typical runtime of 3.7 min.
How did YVO3D 1.0 compare with Forge v2.0 in January 26?
In January 26, YVO3D 1.0 ranked #21 (902 ELO), compared with #20 (923 ELO) for Forge v2.0. Forge v2.0 holds a 21 point advantage, so YVO3D 1.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, YVO3D 1.0 won 41% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 43% for Forge v2.0. YVO3D 1.0 also tends to finish generations faster (3.7 min vs 5.8 min).