TencentARC's image-to-3D model (SIGGRAPH 2026) that back-projects pixel features directly into 3D space for near-reconstruction-level fidelity with PBR textures. Pixel-aligned approach preserves fine surface detail that traditional latent-diffusion-based 3D AI tends to lose. Fully open source with ComfyUI support — you can run it locally or via the published model weights. A different lineage from Tencent's Hunyuan3D, despite the shared parent organisation.
Arena Rank
#20
Overall ELO
960
Geometry ELO
1001
Win Rate
47%
Arena Votes
Total: 93 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.30
Typical runtime: 1.5 min
Curated from neighboring ranks
#19 · 965 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #20 (960 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 currently sits at #19 (965 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 holds a 5 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 47% of its judged matches overall, compared to 47% for Triverse 3.0.
Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 2.0 min).
#21 · 949 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #20 (960 ELO) while Wonder3D currently sits at #21 (949 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 11 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 47% of its judged matches overall, compared to 34% for Wonder3D.
Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 4.0 min).
#18 · 966 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #20 (960 ELO) while VARCO 3D 1.1 currently sits at #18 (966 ELO).
VARCO 3D 1.1 holds a 6 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 47% of its judged matches overall, compared to 37% for VARCO 3D 1.1.
Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 2.0 min).
#22 · 945 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #20 (960 ELO) while VARCO 3D 1.0 currently sits at #22 (945 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 15 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 47% of its judged matches overall, compared to 37% for VARCO 3D 1.0.
Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 2.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Pixal3D?
Pixal3D is sitting at #20 with an arena ELO of 960. It has participated in 93 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Pixal3D?
Pixal3D reports an average generation cost of $0.30 per test with a typical runtime of 1.5 min.
When should I choose Pixal3D over Triverse 3.0?
Pixal3D is ranked #20 (960 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 currently sits at #19 (965 ELO). Triverse 3.0 holds a 5 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Pixal3D wins about 47% of its judged matches overall, compared to 47% for Triverse 3.0. Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 2.0 min).
No reviews with comments yet. Be the first to share your experience!
