TencentARC's image-to-3D model (SIGGRAPH 2026) that back-projects pixel features directly into 3D space for near-reconstruction-level fidelity with PBR textures. Pixel-aligned approach preserves fine surface detail that traditional latent-diffusion-based 3D AI tends to lose. Fully open source with ComfyUI support — you can run it locally or via the published model weights. A different lineage from Tencent's Hunyuan3D, despite the shared parent organisation.
Arena Rank
#14
Overall ELO
992
Geometry ELO
993
Win Rate
49%
Arena Votes
Total: 406 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.30
Typical runtime: 1.5 min
Curated from neighboring ranks
#13 · 1001 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #14 (992 ELO) while YVO3D 2.0 currently sits at #13 (1001 ELO).
YVO3D 2.0 holds a 9 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 49% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for YVO3D 2.0.
Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 6.7 min).
#15 · 980 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #14 (992 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #15 (980 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 12 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 49% of its judged matches overall, compared to 45% for N4D-2.5.
#12 · 1009 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #14 (992 ELO) while Hitem3D v2.1 currently sits at #12 (1009 ELO).
Hitem3D v2.1 holds a 17 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 49% of its judged matches overall, compared to 57% for Hitem3D v2.1.
Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 2.3 min).
#16 · 979 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #14 (992 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 currently sits at #16 (979 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 13 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 49% of its judged matches overall, compared to 47% for Triverse 3.0.
Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 2.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Pixal3D?
Pixal3D is sitting at #14 with an arena ELO of 992. It has participated in 406 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Pixal3D?
Pixal3D reports an average generation cost of $0.30 per test with a typical runtime of 1.5 min.
When should I choose Pixal3D over YVO3D 2.0?
Pixal3D is ranked #14 (992 ELO) while YVO3D 2.0 currently sits at #13 (1001 ELO). YVO3D 2.0 holds a 9 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Pixal3D wins about 49% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for YVO3D 2.0. Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 6.7 min).
