4K Texture · Ultra HD Mesh · Multi-view Input · Free · Commercial Use · API
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
Hi3D · 6 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 6
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Free plan ($0): 100 lifetime credits with limited features and downloads. Plan details
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
52% win rate · 607 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
43 ratings · 14 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#11 / 23
Textured ELO
1012
Geometry ELO
1077
Win Rate
51%
1,049 wins · 1,012 losses
Total: 2,061 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.73
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#10 · 1017 ELO
In December 25, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #11 (1012 ELO), compared with #10 (1017 ELO) for Tripo AI v3.0.
Tripo AI v3.0 holds a 5 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 56% for Tripo AI v3.0.
Tripo AI v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#12 · 1011 ELO
In December 25, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #11 (1012 ELO), compared with #12 (1011 ELO) for TRELLIS.2.
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 1 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 51% for TRELLIS.2.
Hi3D v2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#9 · 1021 ELO
In December 25, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #11 (1012 ELO), compared with #9 (1021 ELO) for Tripo AI v2.5.
Tripo AI v2.5 holds a 9 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 48% for Tripo AI v2.5.
Tripo AI v2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#13 · 1007 ELO
In December 25, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #11 (1012 ELO), compared with #13 (1007 ELO) for Rodin Gen 1.5.
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 5 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 48% for Rodin Gen 1.5.
Rodin Gen 1.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.5 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for Hi3D v2.0 in December 25?
In December 25, Hi3D v2.0 finished at #11 with 1012 ELO and 2,061 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with Hi3D v2.0?
Hi3D v2.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.73 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
How did Hi3D v2.0 compare with Tripo AI v3.0 in December 25?
In December 25, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #11 (1012 ELO), compared with #10 (1017 ELO) for Tripo AI v3.0. Tripo AI v3.0 holds a 5 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 56% for Tripo AI v3.0. Tripo AI v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
