4K Texture · Ultra HD Mesh · Multi-view Input · Free · Commercial Use · API
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
Hi3D · 6 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 6
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Free plan ($0): 100 lifetime credits with limited features and downloads. Plan details
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
53% win rate · 611 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
43 ratings · 14 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#9 / 24
Textured ELO
1033
Geometry ELO
1095
Win Rate
53%
1,007 wins · 890 losses
Total: 1,898 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.73
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#8 · 1047 ELO
In January 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #9 (1033 ELO), compared with #8 (1047 ELO) for Hitem3D v1.0.
Hitem3D v1.0 holds a 14 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 53% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 53% for Hitem3D v1.0.
Hitem3D v1.0 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#10 · 1029 ELO
In January 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #9 (1033 ELO), compared with #10 (1029 ELO) for Meshy 6.
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 4 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 53% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 52% for Meshy 6.
Meshy 6 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 1059 ELO
In January 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #9 (1033 ELO), compared with #7 (1059 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v3.0.
Hunyuan 3D v3.0 holds a 26 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 53% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 58% for Hunyuan 3D v3.0.
Hunyuan 3D v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#11 · 1024 ELO
In January 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #9 (1033 ELO), compared with #11 (1024 ELO) for VARCO 3D 1.0 Preview.
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 9 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 53% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 47% for VARCO 3D 1.0 Preview.
VARCO 3D 1.0 Preview often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for Hi3D v2.0 in January 26?
In January 26, Hi3D v2.0 finished at #9 with 1033 ELO and 1,898 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with Hi3D v2.0?
Hi3D v2.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.73 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
How did Hi3D v2.0 compare with Hitem3D v1.0 in January 26?
In January 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #9 (1033 ELO), compared with #8 (1047 ELO) for Hitem3D v1.0. Hitem3D v1.0 holds a 14 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 53% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 53% for Hitem3D v1.0. Hitem3D v1.0 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
