4K Texture · Ultra HD Mesh · Multi-view Input · Free · Commercial Use · API
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
Hi3D · 6 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 6
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Free plan ($0): 100 lifetime credits with limited features and downloads. Plan details
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
53% win rate · 600 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
43 ratings · 14 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#12 / 25
Textured ELO
1004
Geometry ELO
990
Win Rate
50%
853 wins · 870 losses
Total: 1,723 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.73
Typical runtime: 4.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#11 · 1016 ELO
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.1 ranked #12 (1004 ELO), compared with #11 (1016 ELO) for Rodin Gen 2.0.
Rodin Gen 2.0 holds a 12 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.1 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hi3D v2.1 won 50% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 61% for Rodin Gen 2.0.
#13 · 997 ELO
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.1 ranked #12 (1004 ELO), compared with #13 (997 ELO) for VARCO 3D 1.0.
Hi3D v2.1 maintains a 7 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hi3D v2.1 won 50% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 50% for VARCO 3D 1.0.
VARCO 3D 1.0 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hi3D v2.1 focuses on fidelity.
#10 · 1019 ELO
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.1 ranked #12 (1004 ELO), compared with #10 (1019 ELO) for Pixal3D.
Pixal3D holds a 15 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.1 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hi3D v2.1 won 50% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 49% for Pixal3D.
Hi3D v2.1 also tends to finish generations faster (4.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#14 · 994 ELO
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.1 ranked #12 (1004 ELO), compared with #14 (994 ELO) for Meshy 6.
Hi3D v2.1 maintains a 10 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hi3D v2.1 won 50% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 50% for Meshy 6.
Meshy 6 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Hi3D v2.1 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for Hi3D v2.1 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.1 finished at #12 with 1004 ELO and 1,723 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with Hi3D v2.1?
Hi3D v2.1 reports an average generation cost of $0.73 per test with a typical runtime of 4.0 min.
How did Hi3D v2.1 compare with Rodin Gen 2.0 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.1 ranked #12 (1004 ELO), compared with #11 (1016 ELO) for Rodin Gen 2.0. Rodin Gen 2.0 holds a 12 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.1 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, Hi3D v2.1 won 50% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 61% for Rodin Gen 2.0.
