4K Texture · Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Split into Parts · Image · Free · API · Commercial Use · ComfyUI
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Free exploration ($0); confirming results and some exports require paid credits. Plan details
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
60% win rate · 697 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
41 ratings · 16 written reviews
Pretty solid overall. The mesh quality is good and exports work smoothly. Sometimes the textures come out a bit flat, but for quick prototyping it's really useful.
Arre, average toh banta hai yaar, koi dhamaka nahi!
Great tool, subscription deals are nice. Doesn't read text very well, most of the time not at all but it's definitely in the top 5
Here the PBR texture still need to be improved.
The model feels stable and reliable in all views
Texture quality is shockingly good. No noise, no weird seams.
Guys, this is really cool. You generate first and only pay credits after confirming, which saves a lot! Partial redo and part split are super useful. Tried many tools and Rodin fits best. Hope textures improve more, excited for Gen 2.5 native texture
The geometry quality is the best! Though I hope they can improve more on PBR.
Met the team at SIGGRAPH this year, they got best paper, very impressive. Rodin Gen-2 gives me way more control than any other 3D AI I've tried. Bang, ControlNet, and partial redo, it's like 3D version of Nano Banana.
Love this platform allows you only pay after you're happy with the result. I can try out different ideas, use redo again and again without worrying about wasting credits.
The best ai tool for split to parts
It’s super quick and lightweight, gives instant results, the textures and mesh look pretty good, the UVs are perfectly aligned, and the model’s nicely low-poly.
This is my third option for AI to mesh. Models look good and lots of option. Textures generated are also good quality. I recommend this if other engines are not producing good results.
Very good split into parts feature
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#6 / 10
Low Poly ELO
989
Total votes
274
Win Rate
51%
140 wins · 134 losses
Total: 274 votes
Average Generation Cost
$1.73
Typical runtime: 6.0 min
Nearby ranks in Low Poly
#5 · 1030 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #5 (1030 ELO).
YVO3D 2.5 holds a 41 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 57% for YVO3D 2.5.
YVO3D 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 974 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #7 (974 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 15 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 44% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1035 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while Tripo 3.1 Retopo currently sits at #4 (1035 ELO).
Tripo 3.1 Retopo holds a 46 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 54% for Tripo 3.1 Retopo.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo often returns meshes quicker (2.5 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#8 · 952 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while N4D-2.5 Retopo currently sits at #8 (952 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 37 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for N4D-2.5 Retopo.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 also tends to finish generations faster (6.0 min vs 7.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is sitting at #6 with an arena ELO of 989. It has participated in 274 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 reports an average generation cost of $1.73 per test with a typical runtime of 6.0 min.
When should I choose Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 over YVO3D 2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (989 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #5 (1030 ELO). YVO3D 2.5 holds a 41 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 51% of its judged matches overall, compared to 57% for YVO3D 2.5. YVO3D 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
