4K Texture · Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Split into Parts · Image · Free · API · Commercial Use · ComfyUI
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Free exploration ($0); confirming results and some exports require paid credits. Plan details
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
60% win rate · 701 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
41 ratings · 16 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#6 / 7
Segmentation ELO
925
Total votes
137
Win Rate
38%
52 wins · 85 losses
Total: 137 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.87
Typical runtime: 6.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#5 · 927 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (925 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #5 (927 ELO).
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print holds a 2 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 38% of its judged matches overall, compared to 35% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 920 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (925 ELO) while Roblox CubePart currently sits at #7 (920 ELO).
Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 5 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 38% of its judged matches overall, compared to 33% for Roblox CubePart.
Roblox CubePart often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1016 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (925 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #4 (1016 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 holds a 91 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 38% of its judged matches overall, compared to 51% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#3 · 1040 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (925 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1040 ELO).
Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 115 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 38% of its judged matches overall, compared to 62% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Rodin Gen-2.5?
Rodin Gen-2.5 is sitting at #6 with an arena ELO of 925. It has participated in 137 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Rodin Gen-2.5?
Rodin Gen-2.5 reports an average generation cost of $0.87 per test with a typical runtime of 6.0 min.
When should I choose Rodin Gen-2.5 over Hi3D 2.1 Split to print?
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (925 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #5 (927 ELO). Hi3D 2.1 Split to print holds a 2 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 38% of its judged matches overall, compared to 35% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print. Hi3D 2.1 Split to print often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
