4K Texture · Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Split into Parts · Image · Free · API · Commercial Use · ComfyUI
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Free exploration ($0); confirming results and some exports require paid credits. Plan details
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
59% win rate · 740 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
41 ratings · 16 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#4 / 25
Textured ELO
1088
Geometry ELO
1050
Win Rate
62%
555 wins · 336 losses
Total: 891 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.29
Typical runtime: 4.5 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#3 · 1089 ELO
In Jun 26, Rodin Gen 2.5 ranked #4 (1088 ELO), compared with #3 (1089 ELO) for Lychee Gen 2.
Lychee Gen 2 holds a 1 point advantage, so Rodin Gen 2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Rodin Gen 2.5 won 62% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 60% for Lychee Gen 2.
Rodin Gen 2.5 also tends to finish generations faster (4.5 min vs 6.0 min).
#5 · 1064 ELO
In Jun 26, Rodin Gen 2.5 ranked #4 (1088 ELO), compared with #5 (1064 ELO) for Prism v3.0.
Rodin Gen 2.5 maintains a 24 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Rodin Gen 2.5 won 62% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 52% for Prism v3.0.
#2 · 1122 ELO
In Jun 26, Rodin Gen 2.5 ranked #4 (1088 ELO), compared with #2 (1122 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v3.1.
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 holds a 34 point advantage, so Rodin Gen 2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Rodin Gen 2.5 won 62% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 61% for Hunyuan 3D v3.1.
Rodin Gen 2.5 also tends to finish generations faster (4.5 min vs 8.0 min).
#6 · 1063 ELO
In Jun 26, Rodin Gen 2.5 ranked #4 (1088 ELO), compared with #6 (1063 ELO) for Tripo AI v3.0.
Rodin Gen 2.5 maintains a 25 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Rodin Gen 2.5 won 62% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 54% for Tripo AI v3.0.
Tripo AI v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while Rodin Gen 2.5 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for Rodin Gen 2.5 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, Rodin Gen 2.5 finished at #4 with 1088 ELO and 891 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with Rodin Gen 2.5?
Rodin Gen 2.5 reports an average generation cost of $0.29 per test with a typical runtime of 4.5 min.
How did Rodin Gen 2.5 compare with Lychee Gen 2 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, Rodin Gen 2.5 ranked #4 (1088 ELO), compared with #3 (1089 ELO) for Lychee Gen 2. Lychee Gen 2 holds a 1 point advantage, so Rodin Gen 2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, Rodin Gen 2.5 won 62% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 60% for Lychee Gen 2. Rodin Gen 2.5 also tends to finish generations faster (4.5 min vs 6.0 min).
