Roblox's open-source 3D foundation model for generative creation. Cube turns text prompts into 3D shapes and powers CubePart — open-vocabulary, part-controllable mesh generation that decomposes an object into named, separable parts ready to drop into a game engine without manual cleanup. Released openly on GitHub for developers and researchers.
Open Source · Free · Split into Parts · Image
Roblox's open-source 3D foundation model for generative creation. Cube turns text prompts into 3D shapes and powers CubePart — open-vocabulary, part-controllable mesh generation that decomposes an object into named, separable parts ready to drop into a game engine without manual cleanup. Released openly on GitHub for developers and researchers.
Follow Roblox Cube on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @Roblox1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
0 ratings · 0 written reviews
No reviews with comments yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#7 / 7
Segmentation ELO
927
Total votes
83
Win Rate
34%
28 wins · 55 losses
Total: 83 votes
Average Generation Cost
Free (limited)
Typical runtime: 3.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#6 · 928 ELO
Roblox CubePart is ranked #7 (927 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #6 (928 ELO).
Roblox CubePart maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Roblox CubePart wins about 34% of its judged matches overall, compared to 34% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
#5 · 928 ELO
Roblox CubePart is ranked #7 (927 ELO) while Rodin Gen-2.5 currently sits at #5 (928 ELO).
Rodin Gen-2.5 holds a 1 point advantage, so Roblox CubePart fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Roblox CubePart wins about 34% of its judged matches overall, compared to 37% for Rodin Gen-2.5.
Roblox CubePart also tends to finish generations faster (3.0 min vs 6.0 min).
#4 · 1035 ELO
Roblox CubePart is ranked #7 (927 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #4 (1035 ELO).
Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 107 point advantage, so Roblox CubePart fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Roblox CubePart wins about 34% of its judged matches overall, compared to 62% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Roblox CubePart focuses on fidelity.
#3 · 1039 ELO
Roblox CubePart is ranked #7 (927 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #3 (1039 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 holds a 112 point advantage, so Roblox CubePart fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Roblox CubePart wins about 34% of its judged matches overall, compared to 54% for Alpha3D 5.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Roblox CubePart?
Roblox CubePart is sitting at #7 with an arena ELO of 927. It has participated in 83 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Roblox CubePart?
Roblox CubePart does not expose confirmed pricing data inside Arena mode yet, so costs vary by plan.
When should I choose Roblox CubePart over Hi3D 2.1 Split to print?
Roblox CubePart is ranked #7 (927 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #6 (928 ELO). Roblox CubePart maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes. Roblox CubePart wins about 34% of its judged matches overall, compared to 34% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
