Roblox's open-source 3D foundation model for generative creation. Cube turns text prompts into 3D shapes and powers CubePart — open-vocabulary, part-controllable mesh generation that decomposes an object into named, separable parts ready to drop into a game engine without manual cleanup. Released openly on GitHub for developers and researchers.
Open Source · Free · Split into Parts · Image
Roblox's open-source 3D foundation model for generative creation. Cube turns text prompts into 3D shapes and powers CubePart — open-vocabulary, part-controllable mesh generation that decomposes an object into named, separable parts ready to drop into a game engine without manual cleanup. Released openly on GitHub for developers and researchers.
Follow Roblox Cube on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @Roblox1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
0 ratings · 0 written reviews
No reviews with comments yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#5 / 7
Segmentation ELO
995
Total votes
7
Win Rate
43%
3 wins · 4 losses
Total: 7 votes
Average Generation Cost
Free (limited)
Typical runtime: 3.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#4 · 1000 ELO
Roblox CubePart is ranked #5 (995 ELO) while Tripo Segmentation v2.1 currently sits at #4 (1000 ELO).
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 holds a 5 point advantage, so Roblox CubePart fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Roblox CubePart wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Tripo Segmentation v2.1.
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Roblox CubePart focuses on fidelity.
#6 · 991 ELO
Roblox CubePart is ranked #5 (995 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #6 (991 ELO).
Roblox CubePart maintains a 5 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Roblox CubePart wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 33% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
#3 · 1000 ELO
Roblox CubePart is ranked #5 (995 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1000 ELO).
Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 5 point advantage, so Roblox CubePart fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Roblox CubePart wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Roblox CubePart focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 990 ELO
Roblox CubePart is ranked #5 (995 ELO) while Rodin Gen-2.5 currently sits at #7 (990 ELO).
Roblox CubePart maintains a 5 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Roblox CubePart wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 40% for Rodin Gen-2.5.
Roblox CubePart also tends to finish generations faster (3.0 min vs 6.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Roblox CubePart?
Roblox CubePart is sitting at #5 with an arena ELO of 995. It has participated in 7 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Roblox CubePart?
Roblox CubePart does not expose confirmed pricing data inside Arena mode yet, so costs vary by plan.
When should I choose Roblox CubePart over Tripo Segmentation v2.1?
Roblox CubePart is ranked #5 (995 ELO) while Tripo Segmentation v2.1 currently sits at #4 (1000 ELO). Tripo Segmentation v2.1 holds a 5 point advantage, so Roblox CubePart fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Roblox CubePart wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Tripo Segmentation v2.1. Tripo Segmentation v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Roblox CubePart focuses on fidelity.
