Image · Open Source · Commercial Use · ComfyUI · 4K Texture
Microsoft's 4B-parameter image-to-3D model producing up to 1536³ resolution PBR textured assets. Uses novel O-Voxel representation that handles arbitrary topology including open surfaces and non-manifold geometry. Generates high-fidelity assets in 3-60 seconds depending on resolution. Fully open source under MIT license.
Microsoft's 4B-parameter image-to-3D model producing up to 1536³ resolution PBR textured assets. Uses novel O-Voxel representation that handles arbitrary topology including open surfaces and non-manifold geometry. Generates high-fidelity assets in 3-60 seconds depending on resolution. Fully open source under MIT license.
28% win rate · 618 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
6 ratings · 2 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#15 / 25
Textured ELO
980
Geometry ELO
997
Win Rate
46%
521 wins · 621 losses
Total: 1,142 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.42
Typical runtime: 8.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#14 · 994 ELO
In Jun 26, TRELLIS.2 ranked #15 (980 ELO), compared with #14 (994 ELO) for Meshy 6.
Meshy 6 holds a 14 point advantage, so TRELLIS.2 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, TRELLIS.2 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 50% for Meshy 6.
Meshy 6 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
#16 · 980 ELO
In Jun 26, TRELLIS.2 ranked #15 (980 ELO), compared with #16 (980 ELO) for Triverse 3.0.
TRELLIS.2 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, TRELLIS.2 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 48% for Triverse 3.0.
Triverse 3.0 often returns meshes quicker (7.0 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
#13 · 997 ELO
In Jun 26, TRELLIS.2 ranked #15 (980 ELO), compared with #13 (997 ELO) for VARCO 3D 1.0.
VARCO 3D 1.0 holds a 17 point advantage, so TRELLIS.2 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, TRELLIS.2 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 50% for VARCO 3D 1.0.
VARCO 3D 1.0 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
#17 · 972 ELO
In Jun 26, TRELLIS.2 ranked #15 (980 ELO), compared with #17 (972 ELO) for YVO3D 2.0.
TRELLIS.2 maintains a 8 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, TRELLIS.2 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for YVO3D 2.0.
YVO3D 2.0 often returns meshes quicker (6.7 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for TRELLIS.2 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, TRELLIS.2 finished at #15 with 980 ELO and 1,142 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with TRELLIS.2?
TRELLIS.2 reports an average generation cost of $0.42 per test with a typical runtime of 8.0 min.
How did TRELLIS.2 compare with Meshy 6 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, TRELLIS.2 ranked #15 (980 ELO), compared with #14 (994 ELO) for Meshy 6. Meshy 6 holds a 14 point advantage, so TRELLIS.2 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, TRELLIS.2 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 50% for Meshy 6. Meshy 6 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
