Image · Open Source · Commercial Use · ComfyUI · 4K Texture
Microsoft's 4B-parameter image-to-3D model producing up to 1536³ resolution PBR textured assets. Uses novel O-Voxel representation that handles arbitrary topology including open surfaces and non-manifold geometry. Generates high-fidelity assets in 3-60 seconds depending on resolution. Fully open source under MIT license.
Microsoft's 4B-parameter image-to-3D model producing up to 1536³ resolution PBR textured assets. Uses novel O-Voxel representation that handles arbitrary topology including open surfaces and non-manifold geometry. Generates high-fidelity assets in 3-60 seconds depending on resolution. Fully open source under MIT license.
37% win rate · 19 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
6 ratings · 2 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#12 / 21
Textured ELO
1000
Geometry ELO
981
Win rate · all modes
37%
7 wins · 12 losses
Total: 19 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.42
Typical runtime: 8.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#11 · 1002 ELO
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #12 (1000 ELO) while Meshy 7 currently sits at #11 (1002 ELO).
Meshy 7 holds a 2 point advantage, so TRELLIS.2 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
TRELLIS.2 wins about 37% of its judged matches overall, compared to 59% for Meshy 7.
Meshy 7 often returns meshes quicker (6.9 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
#13 · 994 ELO
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #12 (1000 ELO) while Hi3D v2.1 currently sits at #13 (994 ELO).
TRELLIS.2 maintains a 6 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
TRELLIS.2 wins about 37% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Hi3D v2.1.
Hi3D v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
#10 · 1002 ELO
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #12 (1000 ELO) while VARCO 3D 2.0 currently sits at #10 (1002 ELO).
VARCO 3D 2.0 holds a 2 point advantage, so TRELLIS.2 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
TRELLIS.2 wins about 37% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for VARCO 3D 2.0.
VARCO 3D 2.0 often returns meshes quicker (2.5 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
#14 · 992 ELO
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #12 (1000 ELO) while Hi3D v2.0 currently sits at #14 (992 ELO).
TRELLIS.2 maintains a 8 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
TRELLIS.2 wins about 37% of its judged matches overall, compared to 45% for Hi3D v2.0.
Hi3D v2.0 often returns meshes quicker (7.0 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for TRELLIS.2?
TRELLIS.2 is sitting at #12 with an arena ELO of 1000. It has participated in 19 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with TRELLIS.2?
TRELLIS.2 reports an average generation cost of $0.42 per test with a typical runtime of 8.0 min.
When should I choose TRELLIS.2 over Meshy 7?
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #12 (1000 ELO) while Meshy 7 currently sits at #11 (1002 ELO). Meshy 7 holds a 2 point advantage, so TRELLIS.2 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. TRELLIS.2 wins about 37% of its judged matches overall, compared to 59% for Meshy 7. Meshy 7 often returns meshes quicker (6.9 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
