Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · AI Texturing · Image · Free · Commercial Use · API · 4K Texture
Cloud-based AI 3D generator supporting text-to-3D and image-to-3D with PBR textures up to 4K resolution. Offers polygon control from 50K to 1.5M, multi-image input, AI texturing/retexturing studio, and remeshing with quad/triangle retopology. GLB export optimized for Unity, Unreal, Blender, and 3D printing. API and webhooks available. ~$0.18/generation on paid plans, with a free tier and currently free Pro plan ($20/mo value).
Cloud-based AI 3D generator supporting text-to-3D and image-to-3D with PBR textures up to 4K resolution. Offers polygon control from 50K to 1.5M, multi-image input, AI texturing/retexturing studio, and remeshing with quad/triangle retopology. GLB export optimized for Unity, Unreal, Blender, and 3D printing. API and webhooks available. ~$0.18/generation on paid plans, with a free tier and currently free Pro plan ($20/mo value).
31% win rate · 26 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
3 ratings · 1 written review
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#18 / 21
Textured ELO
973
Geometry ELO
995
Win rate · all modes
31%
8 wins · 18 losses
Total: 26 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.28
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#17 · 990 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #18 (973 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 currently sits at #17 (990 ELO).
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 holds a 17 point advantage, so Triverse 3.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 31% of its judged matches overall, compared to 58% for Hunyuan 3D v3.1.
Triverse 3.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#19 · 972 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #18 (973 ELO) while Sloyd AI v3 currently sits at #19 (972 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 maintains a 1 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 31% of its judged matches overall, compared to 38% for Sloyd AI v3.
Sloyd AI v3 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Triverse 3.0 focuses on fidelity.
#16 · 990 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #18 (973 ELO) while Pixal3D currently sits at #16 (990 ELO).
Pixal3D holds a 17 point advantage, so Triverse 3.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 31% of its judged matches overall, compared to 48% for Pixal3D.
Triverse 3.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#20 · 967 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #18 (973 ELO) while Meshy 6 currently sits at #20 (967 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 maintains a 5 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 31% of its judged matches overall, compared to 48% for Meshy 6.
Meshy 6 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Triverse 3.0 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Triverse 3.0?
Triverse 3.0 is sitting at #18 with an arena ELO of 973. It has participated in 26 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Triverse 3.0?
Triverse 3.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.28 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
When should I choose Triverse 3.0 over Hunyuan 3D v3.1?
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #18 (973 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 currently sits at #17 (990 ELO). Hunyuan 3D v3.1 holds a 17 point advantage, so Triverse 3.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Triverse 3.0 wins about 31% of its judged matches overall, compared to 58% for Hunyuan 3D v3.1. Triverse 3.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
