Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · AI Texturing · Image · Free · Commercial Use · API · 4K Texture
Cloud-based AI 3D generator supporting text-to-3D and image-to-3D with PBR textures up to 4K resolution. Offers polygon control from 50K to 1.5M, multi-image input, AI texturing/retexturing studio, and remeshing with quad/triangle retopology. GLB export optimized for Unity, Unreal, Blender, and 3D printing. API and webhooks available. ~$0.18/generation on paid plans, with a free tier and currently free Pro plan ($20/mo value).
Cloud-based AI 3D generator supporting text-to-3D and image-to-3D with PBR textures up to 4K resolution. Offers polygon control from 50K to 1.5M, multi-image input, AI texturing/retexturing studio, and remeshing with quad/triangle retopology. GLB export optimized for Unity, Unreal, Blender, and 3D printing. API and webhooks available. ~$0.18/generation on paid plans, with a free tier and currently free Pro plan ($20/mo value).
42% win rate · 504 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
3 ratings · 1 written review
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#16 / 21
Textured ELO
983
Geometry ELO
952
Win rate · all modes
42%
212 wins · 292 losses
Total: 504 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.28
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#15 · 988 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #16 (983 ELO) while Sloyd AI v3 currently sits at #15 (988 ELO).
Sloyd AI v3 holds a 6 point advantage, so Triverse 3.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 42% of its judged matches overall, compared to 49% for Sloyd AI v3.
Sloyd AI v3 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Triverse 3.0 focuses on fidelity.
#17 · 980 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #16 (983 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #17 (980 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 maintains a 3 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 42% of its judged matches overall, compared to 47% for N4D-2.5.
Triverse 3.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#14 · 999 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #16 (983 ELO) while Hi3D v2.1 currently sits at #14 (999 ELO).
Hi3D v2.1 holds a 17 point advantage, so Triverse 3.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 42% of its judged matches overall, compared to 52% for Hi3D v2.1.
Hi3D v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while Triverse 3.0 focuses on fidelity.
#18 · 927 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #16 (983 ELO) while Pixal3D currently sits at #18 (927 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 maintains a 56 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 42% of its judged matches overall, compared to 36% for Pixal3D.
Triverse 3.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Triverse 3.0?
Triverse 3.0 is sitting at #16 with an arena ELO of 983. It has participated in 504 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Triverse 3.0?
Triverse 3.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.28 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
When should I choose Triverse 3.0 over Sloyd AI v3?
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #16 (983 ELO) while Sloyd AI v3 currently sits at #15 (988 ELO). Sloyd AI v3 holds a 6 point advantage, so Triverse 3.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Triverse 3.0 wins about 42% of its judged matches overall, compared to 49% for Sloyd AI v3. Sloyd AI v3 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Triverse 3.0 focuses on fidelity.
