4K Texture · Polycount Control · Free · Commercial Use
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
YVO3D · 3 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 3
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
63% win rate · 398 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
38 ratings · 7 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#1 / 23
Textured ELO
1146
Geometry ELO
1167
Win Rate
73%
1,499 wins · 565 losses
Total: 2,064 votes
Average Generation Cost
$1.50
Typical runtime: 6.7 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#2 · 1053 ELO
In December 25, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #1 (1146 ELO), compared with #2 (1053 ELO) for Rodin Gen 2.0.
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 93 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 73% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 58% for Rodin Gen 2.0.
Rodin Gen 2.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#3 · 1053 ELO
In December 25, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #1 (1146 ELO), compared with #3 (1053 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v3.0.
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 93 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 73% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 57% for Hunyuan 3D v3.0.
Hunyuan 3D v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1045 ELO
In December 25, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #1 (1146 ELO), compared with #4 (1045 ELO) for Hitem3D v1.5.
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 101 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 73% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 54% for Hitem3D v1.5.
Hitem3D v1.5 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#5 · 1039 ELO
In December 25, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #1 (1146 ELO), compared with #5 (1039 ELO) for Meshy 6.
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 107 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 73% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 53% for Meshy 6.
Meshy 6 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for YVO3D 2.0 in December 25?
In December 25, YVO3D 2.0 finished at #1 with 1146 ELO and 2,064 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with YVO3D 2.0?
YVO3D 2.0 reports an average generation cost of $1.50 per test with a typical runtime of 6.7 min.
How did YVO3D 2.0 compare with Rodin Gen 2.0 in December 25?
In December 25, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #1 (1146 ELO), compared with #2 (1053 ELO) for Rodin Gen 2.0. YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 93 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes. During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 73% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 58% for Rodin Gen 2.0. Rodin Gen 2.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
