4K Texture · Polycount Control · Free · Commercial Use
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
63% win rate · 401 votes across modes
YVO3D · 3 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 3
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
38 ratings · 7 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#5 / 24
Textured ELO
1066
Geometry ELO
1131
Win Rate
64%
1,217 wins · 681 losses
Total: 1,898 votes
Average Generation Cost
$1.50
Typical runtime: 6.7 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#4 · 1083 ELO
In January 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #5 (1066 ELO), compared with #4 (1083 ELO) for Tripo AI v3.0.
Tripo AI v3.0 holds a 17 point advantage, so YVO3D 2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 64% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 58% for Tripo AI v3.0.
Tripo AI v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#6 · 1066 ELO
In January 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #5 (1066 ELO), compared with #6 (1066 ELO) for Prism v3.0.
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 64% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 57% for Prism v3.0.
Prism v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.3 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#3 · 1086 ELO
In January 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #5 (1066 ELO), compared with #3 (1086 ELO) for Hitem3D v1.5.
Hitem3D v1.5 holds a 20 point advantage, so YVO3D 2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 64% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 56% for Hitem3D v1.5.
Hitem3D v1.5 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 1059 ELO
In January 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #5 (1066 ELO), compared with #7 (1059 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v3.0.
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 7 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 64% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 58% for Hunyuan 3D v3.0.
Hunyuan 3D v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for YVO3D 2.0 in January 26?
In January 26, YVO3D 2.0 finished at #5 with 1066 ELO and 1,898 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with YVO3D 2.0?
YVO3D 2.0 reports an average generation cost of $1.50 per test with a typical runtime of 6.7 min.
How did YVO3D 2.0 compare with Tripo AI v3.0 in January 26?
In January 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #5 (1066 ELO), compared with #4 (1083 ELO) for Tripo AI v3.0. Tripo AI v3.0 holds a 17 point advantage, so YVO3D 2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 64% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 58% for Tripo AI v3.0. Tripo AI v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.0 focuses on fidelity.
