4K Texture · Polycount Control · Free · Commercial Use
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
YVO3D · 3 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 3
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
63% win rate · 398 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
38 ratings · 7 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#17 / 25
Textured ELO
972
Geometry ELO
1010
Win Rate
46%
288 wins · 343 losses
Total: 631 votes
Average Generation Cost
$1.50
Typical runtime: 6.7 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#16 · 980 ELO
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #17 (972 ELO), compared with #16 (980 ELO) for Triverse 3.0.
Triverse 3.0 holds a 8 point advantage, so YVO3D 2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 48% for Triverse 3.0.
YVO3D 2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (6.7 min vs 7.0 min).
#18 · 969 ELO
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #17 (972 ELO), compared with #18 (969 ELO) for Hi3D v2.0.
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 3 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 44% for Hi3D v2.0.
YVO3D 2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (6.7 min vs 7.0 min).
#15 · 980 ELO
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #17 (972 ELO), compared with #15 (980 ELO) for TRELLIS.2.
TRELLIS.2 holds a 8 point advantage, so YVO3D 2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for TRELLIS.2.
YVO3D 2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (6.7 min vs 8.0 min).
#19 · 964 ELO
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #17 (972 ELO), compared with #19 (964 ELO) for N4D-2.5.
YVO3D 2.0 maintains a 8 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 44% for N4D-2.5.
YVO3D 2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (6.7 min vs 8.0 min).
What was the Top 3D AI rank for YVO3D 2.0 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.0 finished at #17 with 972 ELO and 631 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with YVO3D 2.0?
YVO3D 2.0 reports an average generation cost of $1.50 per test with a typical runtime of 6.7 min.
How did YVO3D 2.0 compare with Triverse 3.0 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.0 ranked #17 (972 ELO), compared with #16 (980 ELO) for Triverse 3.0. Triverse 3.0 holds a 8 point advantage, so YVO3D 2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, YVO3D 2.0 won 46% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 48% for Triverse 3.0. YVO3D 2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (6.7 min vs 7.0 min).
