4K Texture · Polycount Control · Free · Commercial Use
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
YVO3D · 3 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 3
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
First to introduce 4K textures, then 8K — texturing is their main focus. Exceptional for organic subjects like faces where textures can look truly amazing. Less consistent on hard-surface models. Can be outstanding for specific use cases, but also the most expensive option on the market.
63% win rate · 401 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
38 ratings · 7 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#9 / 25
Textured ELO
1029
Geometry ELO
1076
Win Rate
51%
342 wins · 333 losses
Total: 675 votes
Average Generation Cost
$4.50
Typical runtime: 5.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#8 · 1041 ELO
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.5 ranked #9 (1029 ELO), compared with #8 (1041 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v3.0.
Hunyuan 3D v3.0 holds a 12 point advantage, so YVO3D 2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 2.5 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 50% for Hunyuan 3D v3.0.
Hunyuan 3D v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#10 · 1019 ELO
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.5 ranked #9 (1029 ELO), compared with #10 (1019 ELO) for Pixal3D.
YVO3D 2.5 maintains a 10 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.5 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 49% for Pixal3D.
YVO3D 2.5 also tends to finish generations faster (5.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#7 · 1049 ELO
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.5 ranked #9 (1029 ELO), compared with #7 (1049 ELO) for Seed3D v2.0.
Seed3D v2.0 holds a 20 point advantage, so YVO3D 2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, YVO3D 2.5 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 57% for Seed3D v2.0.
YVO3D 2.5 also tends to finish generations faster (5.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#11 · 1016 ELO
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.5 ranked #9 (1029 ELO), compared with #11 (1016 ELO) for Rodin Gen 2.0.
YVO3D 2.5 maintains a 13 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, YVO3D 2.5 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 61% for Rodin Gen 2.0.
Rodin Gen 2.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.5 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for YVO3D 2.5 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.5 finished at #9 with 1029 ELO and 675 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with YVO3D 2.5?
YVO3D 2.5 reports an average generation cost of $4.50 per test with a typical runtime of 5.0 min.
How did YVO3D 2.5 compare with Hunyuan 3D v3.0 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, YVO3D 2.5 ranked #9 (1029 ELO), compared with #8 (1041 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v3.0. Hunyuan 3D v3.0 holds a 12 point advantage, so YVO3D 2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, YVO3D 2.5 won 51% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 50% for Hunyuan 3D v3.0. Hunyuan 3D v3.0 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while YVO3D 2.5 focuses on fidelity.
