4K Texture · Ultra HD Mesh · Multi-view Input · Free · Commercial Use · API
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
Hi3D · 6 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 6
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Free plan ($0): 100 lifetime credits with limited features and downloads. Plan details
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
53% win rate · 546 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
43 ratings · 14 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#15 / 21
Textured ELO
1000
Geometry ELO
1044
Win rate · all modes
53%
288 wins · 258 losses
Total: 546 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.73
Typical runtime: 4.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#14 · 1009 ELO
Hi3D v2.1 is ranked #15 (1000 ELO) while Hi3D v2.0 currently sits at #14 (1009 ELO).
Hi3D v2.0 holds a 9 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.1 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D v2.1 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 52% for Hi3D v2.0.
Hi3D v2.1 also tends to finish generations faster (4.0 min vs 7.0 min).
#16 · 998 ELO
Hi3D v2.1 is ranked #15 (1000 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #16 (998 ELO).
Hi3D v2.1 maintains a 2 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hi3D v2.1 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 48% for N4D-2.5.
Hi3D v2.1 also tends to finish generations faster (4.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#13 · 1009 ELO
Hi3D v2.1 is ranked #15 (1000 ELO) while Meshy 6 currently sits at #13 (1009 ELO).
Meshy 6 holds a 10 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.1 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D v2.1 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 53% for Meshy 6.
Meshy 6 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Hi3D v2.1 focuses on fidelity.
#17 · 997 ELO
Hi3D v2.1 is ranked #15 (1000 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 currently sits at #17 (997 ELO).
Hi3D v2.1 maintains a 3 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hi3D v2.1 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for Triverse 3.0.
Hi3D v2.1 also tends to finish generations faster (4.0 min vs 7.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hi3D v2.1?
Hi3D v2.1 is sitting at #15 with an arena ELO of 1000. It has participated in 546 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hi3D v2.1?
Hi3D v2.1 reports an average generation cost of $0.73 per test with a typical runtime of 4.0 min.
When should I choose Hi3D v2.1 over Hi3D v2.0?
Hi3D v2.1 is ranked #15 (1000 ELO) while Hi3D v2.0 currently sits at #14 (1009 ELO). Hi3D v2.0 holds a 9 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.1 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hi3D v2.1 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 52% for Hi3D v2.0. Hi3D v2.1 also tends to finish generations faster (4.0 min vs 7.0 min).
