Multi-view Input · Studio · AI Retopology · AI Texturing · AI Rigging · Free · API
Tencent's closed-source 3D AI — arguably the best free option on the market right now. Version 3.0 delivers up to 1.5M polygon models with impressive detail. Don't confuse with the open-source Hunyuan v2.1. API available for heavier usage; note the platform is Chinese-first with limited English UI.
Hunyuan 3D · 6 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 6
3 articles
Articles 1–1 of 3
Tencent's closed-source 3D AI — arguably the best free option on the market right now. Version 3.0 delivers up to 1.5M polygon models with impressive detail. Don't confuse with the open-source Hunyuan v2.1. API available for heavier usage; note the platform is Chinese-first with limited English UI.
59% win rate · 665 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
55 ratings · 24 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#2 / 7
Segmentation ELO
1054
Total votes
163
Win Rate
64%
104 wins · 59 losses
Total: 163 votes
Average Generation Cost
Free (limited)
Typical runtime: 8.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#1 · 1078 ELO
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter is ranked #2 (1054 ELO) while Tripo Segmentation v2.1 currently sits at #1 (1078 ELO).
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 holds a 24 point advantage, so Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter wins about 64% of its judged matches overall, compared to 66% for Tripo Segmentation v2.1.
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter focuses on fidelity.
#3 · 1040 ELO
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter is ranked #2 (1054 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1040 ELO).
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter maintains a 14 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter wins about 64% of its judged matches overall, compared to 62% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1016 ELO
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter is ranked #2 (1054 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #4 (1016 ELO).
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter maintains a 38 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter wins about 64% of its judged matches overall, compared to 51% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter focuses on fidelity.
#5 · 927 ELO
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter is ranked #2 (1054 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #5 (927 ELO).
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter maintains a 127 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter wins about 64% of its judged matches overall, compared to 35% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter?
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter is sitting at #2 with an arena ELO of 1054. It has participated in 163 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter?
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter does not expose confirmed pricing data inside Arena mode yet, so costs vary by plan.
When should I choose Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter over Tripo Segmentation v2.1?
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter is ranked #2 (1054 ELO) while Tripo Segmentation v2.1 currently sits at #1 (1078 ELO). Tripo Segmentation v2.1 holds a 24 point advantage, so Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter wins about 64% of its judged matches overall, compared to 66% for Tripo Segmentation v2.1. Tripo Segmentation v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 Part Splitter focuses on fidelity.
