4K Texture · Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Split into Parts · Image · Free · API · Commercial Use · ComfyUI
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Free exploration ($0); confirming results and some exports require paid credits. Plan details
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
53% win rate · 19 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
41 ratings · 16 written reviews
Pretty solid overall. The mesh quality is good and exports work smoothly. Sometimes the textures come out a bit flat, but for quick prototyping it's really useful.
Arre, average toh banta hai yaar, koi dhamaka nahi!
Great tool, subscription deals are nice. Doesn't read text very well, most of the time not at all but it's definitely in the top 5
Here the PBR texture still need to be improved.
The model feels stable and reliable in all views
Texture quality is shockingly good. No noise, no weird seams.
Guys, this is really cool. You generate first and only pay credits after confirming, which saves a lot! Partial redo and part split are super useful. Tried many tools and Rodin fits best. Hope textures improve more, excited for Gen 2.5 native texture
The geometry quality is the best! Though I hope they can improve more on PBR.
Met the team at SIGGRAPH this year, they got best paper, very impressive. Rodin Gen-2 gives me way more control than any other 3D AI I've tried. Bang, ControlNet, and partial redo, it's like 3D version of Nano Banana.
Love this platform allows you only pay after you're happy with the result. I can try out different ideas, use redo again and again without worrying about wasting credits.
The best ai tool for split to parts
It’s super quick and lightweight, gives instant results, the textures and mesh look pretty good, the UVs are perfectly aligned, and the model’s nicely low-poly.
This is my third option for AI to mesh. Models look good and lots of option. Textures generated are also good quality. I recommend this if other engines are not producing good results.
Very good split into parts feature
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#6 / 10
Low Poly ELO
1002
Total votes
10
Win Rate
50%
5 wins · 5 losses
Total: 10 votes
Average Generation Cost
$1.73
Typical runtime: 6.0 min
Nearby ranks in Low Poly
#5 · 1003 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D Retopo currently sits at #5 (1003 ELO).
Hunyuan 3D Retopo holds a 1 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 54% for Hunyuan 3D Retopo.
Hunyuan 3D Retopo often returns meshes quicker (5.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 996 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while Tripo 3.1 Retopo currently sits at #7 (996 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 5 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 44% for Tripo 3.1 Retopo.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo often returns meshes quicker (2.5 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1004 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #4 (1004 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 holds a 2 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 55% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#8 · 991 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #8 (991 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 11 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for YVO3D 2.5.
YVO3D 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is sitting at #6 with an arena ELO of 1002. It has participated in 10 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 reports an average generation cost of $1.73 per test with a typical runtime of 6.0 min.
When should I choose Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 over Hunyuan 3D Retopo?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D Retopo currently sits at #5 (1003 ELO). Hunyuan 3D Retopo holds a 1 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 54% for Hunyuan 3D Retopo. Hunyuan 3D Retopo often returns meshes quicker (5.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
