Tencent's closed-source 3D AI — arguably the best free option on the market right now. Version 3.0 delivers up to 1.5M polygon models with impressive detail. Don't confuse with the open-source Hunyuan v2.1. API available for heavier usage; note the platform is Chinese-first with limited English UI.
Model Versions (3)
Arena Rank
#16
Overall ELO
995
Geometry ELO
999
Win Rate
48%
Arena Votes
Total: 221 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.30
Typical runtime: 1.5 min
Curated from neighboring ranks
#15 · 997 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #16 (995 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 currently sits at #15 (997 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 holds a 2 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 48% of its judged matches overall, compared to 49% for Triverse 3.0.
Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 2.0 min).
#17 · 977 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #16 (995 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #17 (977 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 18 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 48% of its judged matches overall, compared to 42% for TRELLIS.2.
TRELLIS.2 often returns meshes quicker (1.0 min) while Pixal3D focuses on fidelity.
#14 · 1002 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #16 (995 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #14 (1002 ELO).
N4D-2.5 holds a 7 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 48% of its judged matches overall, compared to 46% for N4D-2.5.
#18 · 976 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #16 (995 ELO) while Rodin Gen 2.0 currently sits at #18 (976 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 19 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 48% of its judged matches overall, compared to 49% for Rodin Gen 2.0.
Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 4.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Pixal3D?
Pixal3D is sitting at #16 with an arena ELO of 995. It has participated in 221 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Pixal3D?
Pixal3D reports an average generation cost of $0.30 per test with a typical runtime of 1.5 min.
When should I choose Pixal3D over Triverse 3.0?
Pixal3D is ranked #16 (995 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 currently sits at #15 (997 ELO). Triverse 3.0 holds a 2 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Pixal3D wins about 48% of its judged matches overall, compared to 49% for Triverse 3.0. Pixal3D also tends to finish generations faster (1.5 min vs 2.0 min).
Follow Hunyuan 3D on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @TencentHunyuan
