4K Texture · Ultra HD Mesh · Multi-view Input · Free · Commercial Use · API
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
Hi3D · 6 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 6
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Free plan ($0): 100 lifetime credits with limited features and downloads. Plan details
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
65% win rate · 624 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
43 ratings · 14 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#5 / 7
Segmentation ELO
927
Total votes
127
Win Rate
35%
44 wins · 83 losses
Total: 127 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.75
Typical runtime: 3.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#4 · 1016 ELO
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #5 (927 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #4 (1016 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 holds a 89 point advantage, so Hi3D 2.1 Split to print fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 35% of its judged matches overall, compared to 51% for Alpha3D 5.
#6 · 925 ELO
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #5 (927 ELO) while Rodin Gen-2.5 currently sits at #6 (925 ELO).
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print maintains a 2 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 35% of its judged matches overall, compared to 38% for Rodin Gen-2.5.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print also tends to finish generations faster (3.0 min vs 6.0 min).
#3 · 1040 ELO
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #5 (927 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1040 ELO).
Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 113 point advantage, so Hi3D 2.1 Split to print fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 35% of its judged matches overall, compared to 62% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 920 ELO
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #5 (927 ELO) while Roblox CubePart currently sits at #7 (920 ELO).
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print maintains a 7 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 35% of its judged matches overall, compared to 33% for Roblox CubePart.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print?
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is sitting at #5 with an arena ELO of 927. It has participated in 127 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hi3D 2.1 Split to print?
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print reports an average generation cost of $0.75 per test with a typical runtime of 3.0 min.
When should I choose Hi3D 2.1 Split to print over Alpha3D 5?
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #5 (927 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #4 (1016 ELO). Alpha3D 5 holds a 89 point advantage, so Hi3D 2.1 Split to print fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 35% of its judged matches overall, compared to 51% for Alpha3D 5.
