4K Texture · Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Split into Parts · Image · Free · API · Commercial Use · ComfyUI
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Free exploration ($0); confirming results and some exports require paid credits. Plan details
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
56% win rate · 18 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
41 ratings · 16 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#6 / 10
Low Poly ELO
1002
Total votes
10
Win Rate
50%
5 wins · 5 losses
Total: 10 votes
Average Generation Cost
$1.73
Typical runtime: 6.0 min
Nearby ranks in Low Poly
#5 · 1003 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D Retopo currently sits at #5 (1003 ELO).
Hunyuan 3D Retopo holds a 1 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 54% for Hunyuan 3D Retopo.
Hunyuan 3D Retopo often returns meshes quicker (5.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 1000 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while Tripo 3.1 Retopo currently sits at #7 (1000 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 1 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 47% for Tripo 3.1 Retopo.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo often returns meshes quicker (2.5 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1004 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #4 (1004 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 holds a 2 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 55% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#8 · 987 ELO
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #8 (987 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 14 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 38% for YVO3D 2.5.
YVO3D 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is sitting at #6 with an arena ELO of 1002. It has participated in 10 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 reports an average generation cost of $1.73 per test with a typical runtime of 6.0 min.
When should I choose Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 over Hunyuan 3D Retopo?
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #6 (1002 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D Retopo currently sits at #5 (1003 ELO). Hunyuan 3D Retopo holds a 1 point advantage, so Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 50% of its judged matches overall, compared to 54% for Hunyuan 3D Retopo. Hunyuan 3D Retopo often returns meshes quicker (5.0 min) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
