Image · API · Commercial Use · Polycount Control · AI Rigging
Built by DreamTech on their proprietary Direct3D-S2 architecture, Neural4D delivers high-fidelity 3D models with clean topology and PBR textures. Their N4D-2.5 model generates at 2K (2048³) spatial resolution in under 90 seconds — one of the fastest in the industry. Supports text-to-3D and image-to-3D with production-ready, 3D-print-ready output. API available at ~$0.15/generation. A strong newcomer worth watching.
Built by DreamTech on their proprietary Direct3D-S2 architecture, Neural4D delivers high-fidelity 3D models with clean topology and PBR textures. Their N4D-2.5 model generates at 2K (2048³) spatial resolution in under 90 seconds — one of the fastest in the industry. Supports text-to-3D and image-to-3D with production-ready, 3D-print-ready output. API available at ~$0.15/generation. A strong newcomer worth watching.
63% win rate · 19 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
4 ratings · 0 written reviews
No reviews with comments yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#9 / 10
Low Poly ELO
969
Total votes
15
Win Rate
27%
4 wins · 11 losses
Total: 15 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.32
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Nearby ranks in Low Poly
#8 · 991 ELO
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #9 (969 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #8 (991 ELO).
YVO3D 2.5 holds a 22 point advantage, so N4D-2.5 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 27% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for YVO3D 2.5.
YVO3D 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
#10 · 969 ELO
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #9 (969 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 Artist Mesh currently sits at #10 (969 ELO).
N4D-2.5 Retopo maintains a 1 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 27% of its judged matches overall, compared to 23% for Triverse 3.0 Artist Mesh.
Triverse 3.0 Artist Mesh often returns meshes quicker (1.0 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
#7 · 996 ELO
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #9 (969 ELO) while Tripo 3.1 Retopo currently sits at #7 (996 ELO).
Tripo 3.1 Retopo holds a 27 point advantage, so N4D-2.5 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 27% of its judged matches overall, compared to 44% for Tripo 3.1 Retopo.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo often returns meshes quicker (2.5 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
#6 · 1002 ELO
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #9 (969 ELO) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 currently sits at #6 (1002 ELO).
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 holds a 32 point advantage, so N4D-2.5 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 27% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5.
Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 often returns meshes quicker (6.0 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for N4D-2.5 Retopo?
N4D-2.5 Retopo is sitting at #9 with an arena ELO of 969. It has participated in 15 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with N4D-2.5 Retopo?
N4D-2.5 Retopo reports an average generation cost of $0.32 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
When should I choose N4D-2.5 Retopo over YVO3D 2.5?
N4D-2.5 Retopo is ranked #9 (969 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #8 (991 ELO). YVO3D 2.5 holds a 22 point advantage, so N4D-2.5 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. N4D-2.5 Retopo wins about 27% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for YVO3D 2.5. YVO3D 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while N4D-2.5 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
