TencentARC's image-to-3D model (SIGGRAPH 2026) that back-projects pixel features directly into 3D space for near-reconstruction-level fidelity with PBR textures. Pixel-aligned approach preserves fine surface detail that traditional latent-diffusion-based 3D AI tends to lose. Fully open source under MIT license with ComfyUI support — you can run it locally or via the published model weights. A different lineage from Tencent's Hunyuan3D, despite the shared parent organisation.
Arena Rank
#17
Overall ELO
956
Geometry ELO
916
Win Rate
40%
Arena Votes
Total: 876 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.42
Typical runtime: 8.0 min
Curated from neighboring ranks
#16 · 972 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #17 (956 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #16 (972 ELO).
TRELLIS.2 holds a 17 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 39% for TRELLIS.2.
#18 · 955 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #17 (956 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 currently sits at #18 (955 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 41% for Triverse 3.0.
Triverse 3.0 often returns meshes quicker (7.0 min) while Pixal3D focuses on fidelity.
#15 · 985 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #17 (956 ELO) while Hi3D v2.0 currently sits at #15 (985 ELO).
Hi3D v2.0 holds a 30 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 52% for Hi3D v2.0.
Hi3D v2.0 often returns meshes quicker (7.0 min) while Pixal3D focuses on fidelity.
#19 · 845 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #17 (956 ELO) while Wonder3D currently sits at #19 (845 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 111 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 24% for Wonder3D.
Wonder3D often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while Pixal3D focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Pixal3D?
Pixal3D is sitting at #17 with an arena ELO of 956. It has participated in 876 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Pixal3D?
Pixal3D reports an average generation cost of $0.42 per test with a typical runtime of 8.0 min.
When should I choose Pixal3D over TRELLIS.2?
Pixal3D is ranked #17 (956 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #16 (972 ELO). TRELLIS.2 holds a 17 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Pixal3D wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 39% for TRELLIS.2.
