API · Commercial Use
ByteDance's recent entry into 3D AI (late 2025) — a promising, competitive model with PBR textures and good detail. Already available via API on fal.ai and 3D AI Studio, though direct access through ByteDance is harder to get. Strong start from a major player.
ByteDance's recent entry into 3D AI (late 2025) — a promising, competitive model with PBR textures and good detail. Already available via API on fal.ai and 3D AI Studio, though direct access through ByteDance is harder to get. Strong start from a major player.
61% win rate · 28 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
11 ratings · 1 written review
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#6 / 21
Textured ELO
1021
Geometry ELO
1008
Win rate · all modes
61%
17 wins · 11 losses
Total: 28 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.33
Typical runtime: 8.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#5 · 1022 ELO
Seed3D v2.0 is ranked #6 (1021 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #5 (1022 ELO).
N4D-2.5 holds a 1 point advantage, so Seed3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Seed3D v2.0 wins about 61% of its judged matches overall, compared to 65% for N4D-2.5.
#7 · 1012 ELO
Seed3D v2.0 is ranked #6 (1021 ELO) while Rodin Gen 2.5 currently sits at #7 (1012 ELO).
Seed3D v2.0 maintains a 9 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Seed3D v2.0 wins about 61% of its judged matches overall, compared to 56% for Rodin Gen 2.5.
Rodin Gen 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (4.5 min) while Seed3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1024 ELO
Seed3D v2.0 is ranked #6 (1021 ELO) while Hi3D v3.0 currently sits at #4 (1024 ELO).
Hi3D v3.0 holds a 3 point advantage, so Seed3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Seed3D v2.0 wins about 61% of its judged matches overall, compared to 79% for Hi3D v3.0.
Seed3D v2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (8.0 min vs 9.0 min).
#8 · 1010 ELO
Seed3D v2.0 is ranked #6 (1021 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #8 (1010 ELO).
Seed3D v2.0 maintains a 11 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Seed3D v2.0 wins about 61% of its judged matches overall, compared to 72% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Seed3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Seed3D v2.0?
Seed3D v2.0 is sitting at #6 with an arena ELO of 1021. It has participated in 28 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Seed3D v2.0?
Seed3D v2.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.33 per test with a typical runtime of 8.0 min.
When should I choose Seed3D v2.0 over N4D-2.5?
Seed3D v2.0 is ranked #6 (1021 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #5 (1022 ELO). N4D-2.5 holds a 1 point advantage, so Seed3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Seed3D v2.0 wins about 61% of its judged matches overall, compared to 65% for N4D-2.5.
