Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Studio · Split into Parts · AI Rigging · Image · Free · Commercial Use · API · Ultra HD Mesh · ComfyUI
Full-featured platform with their own trained models, plus texturing, rigging, and part segmentation — a complete A to Z workflow. They update frequently and offer excellent API and developer support. Not always top-tier quality, but a well-balanced, reliable option for general use.
Tripo AI · 3 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 3
3 articles
Articles 1–1 of 3
Free plan ($0): 200 monthly credits, public models, non-commercial use, and limited exports. Plan details
Full-featured platform with their own trained models, plus texturing, rigging, and part segmentation — a complete A to Z workflow. They update frequently and offer excellent API and developer support. Not always top-tier quality, but a well-balanced, reliable option for general use.
70% win rate · 604 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
68 ratings · 27 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#4 / 10
Low Poly ELO
1035
Total votes
372
Win Rate
54%
202 wins · 170 losses
Total: 372 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.16
Typical runtime: 2.5 min
Nearby ranks in Low Poly
#3 · 1053 ELO
Tripo 3.1 Retopo is ranked #4 (1035 ELO) while Meshy T2 currently sits at #3 (1053 ELO).
Meshy T2 holds a 17 point advantage, so Tripo 3.1 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo wins about 54% of its judged matches overall, compared to 59% for Meshy T2.
Meshy T2 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Tripo 3.1 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
#5 · 1030 ELO
Tripo 3.1 Retopo is ranked #4 (1035 ELO) while YVO3D 2.5 currently sits at #5 (1030 ELO).
Tripo 3.1 Retopo maintains a 5 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo wins about 54% of its judged matches overall, compared to 57% for YVO3D 2.5.
YVO3D 2.5 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Tripo 3.1 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
#2 · 1060 ELO
Tripo 3.1 Retopo is ranked #4 (1035 ELO) while Tripo P1.0 currently sits at #2 (1060 ELO).
Tripo P1.0 holds a 25 point advantage, so Tripo 3.1 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo wins about 54% of its judged matches overall, compared to 64% for Tripo P1.0.
Tripo P1.0 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Tripo 3.1 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
#6 · 989 ELO
Tripo 3.1 Retopo is ranked #4 (1035 ELO) while Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5 currently sits at #6 (989 ELO).
Tripo 3.1 Retopo maintains a 46 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo wins about 54% of its judged matches overall, compared to 51% for Hyper3D Rodin Gen-2.5.
Tripo 3.1 Retopo also tends to finish generations faster (2.5 min vs 6.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Tripo 3.1 Retopo?
Tripo 3.1 Retopo is sitting at #4 with an arena ELO of 1035. It has participated in 372 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Tripo 3.1 Retopo?
Tripo 3.1 Retopo reports an average generation cost of $0.16 per test with a typical runtime of 2.5 min.
When should I choose Tripo 3.1 Retopo over Meshy T2?
Tripo 3.1 Retopo is ranked #4 (1035 ELO) while Meshy T2 currently sits at #3 (1053 ELO). Meshy T2 holds a 17 point advantage, so Tripo 3.1 Retopo fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Tripo 3.1 Retopo wins about 54% of its judged matches overall, compared to 59% for Meshy T2. Meshy T2 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Tripo 3.1 Retopo focuses on fidelity.
