4K Texture · Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Split into Parts · Image · Free · API · Commercial Use · ComfyUI
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Free exploration ($0); confirming results and some exports require paid credits. Plan details
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
59% win rate · 753 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
41 ratings · 16 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#7 / 7
Segmentation ELO
915
Total votes
149
Win Rate
36%
54 wins · 95 losses
Total: 149 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.87
Typical runtime: 6.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#6 · 922 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (915 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #6 (922 ELO).
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print holds a 6 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 34% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#5 · 923 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (915 ELO) while Roblox CubePart currently sits at #5 (923 ELO).
Roblox CubePart holds a 8 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 33% for Roblox CubePart.
Roblox CubePart often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1009 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (915 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #4 (1009 ELO).
Alpha3D 5 holds a 93 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#3 · 1047 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (915 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1047 ELO).
Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 132 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 63% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Rodin Gen-2.5?
Rodin Gen-2.5 is sitting at #7 with an arena ELO of 915. It has participated in 149 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Rodin Gen-2.5?
Rodin Gen-2.5 reports an average generation cost of $0.87 per test with a typical runtime of 6.0 min.
When should I choose Rodin Gen-2.5 over Hi3D 2.1 Split to print?
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (915 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #6 (922 ELO). Hi3D 2.1 Split to print holds a 6 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 36% of its judged matches overall, compared to 34% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print. Hi3D 2.1 Split to print often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
