Free · Image · Commercial Use · API · Open Source · Split into Parts
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
SAM 3D (Meta) · 1 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 1
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
12% win rate · 721 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
13 ratings · 3 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#21 / 21
Textured ELO
733
Geometry ELO
829
Win rate · all modes
12%
86 wins · 635 losses
Total: 721 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.02
Typical runtime: 55s
Nearby ranks in Textured
#20 · 852 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (733 ELO) while Wonder3D currently sits at #20 (852 ELO).
Wonder3D holds a 119 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 12% of its judged matches overall, compared to 22% for Wonder3D.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 4.0 min).
#19 · 862 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (733 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #19 (862 ELO).
TRELLIS.2 holds a 129 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 12% of its judged matches overall, compared to 28% for TRELLIS.2.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
#18 · 918 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (733 ELO) while Pixal3D currently sits at #18 (918 ELO).
Pixal3D holds a 185 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 12% of its judged matches overall, compared to 36% for Pixal3D.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
#17 · 990 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (733 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #17 (990 ELO).
N4D-2.5 holds a 256 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 12% of its judged matches overall, compared to 48% for N4D-2.5.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for SAM 3D?
SAM 3D is sitting at #21 with an arena ELO of 733. It has participated in 721 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with SAM 3D?
SAM 3D reports an average generation cost of $0.02 per test with a typical runtime of 55s.
When should I choose SAM 3D over Wonder3D?
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (733 ELO) while Wonder3D currently sits at #20 (852 ELO). Wonder3D holds a 119 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. SAM 3D wins about 12% of its judged matches overall, compared to 22% for Wonder3D. SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 4.0 min).
