4K Texture · Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Split into Parts · Image · Free · API · Commercial Use · ComfyUI
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
Free exploration ($0); confirming results and some exports require paid credits. Plan details
A pioneer in AI 3D with quality results and a polished UI. Features HDR generation, online sculpting, texturing tools, and was one of the first to offer part generation. Ecosystem plugins let you generate models directly into Blender or Unreal Engine. A solid balanced option with nice infrastructure.
56% win rate · 18 votes across modes
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
41 ratings · 16 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#7 / 7
Segmentation ELO
990
Total votes
10
Win Rate
40%
4 wins · 6 losses
Total: 10 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.87
Typical runtime: 6.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#6 · 991 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (990 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #6 (991 ELO).
Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 33% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#5 · 995 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (990 ELO) while Roblox CubePart currently sits at #5 (995 ELO).
Roblox CubePart holds a 5 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for Roblox CubePart.
Roblox CubePart often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#4 · 1000 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (990 ELO) while Tripo Segmentation v2.1 currently sits at #4 (1000 ELO).
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 holds a 10 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Tripo Segmentation v2.1.
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
#3 · 1000 ELO
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (990 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1000 ELO).
Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 10 point advantage, so Rodin Gen-2.5 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Rodin Gen-2.5?
Rodin Gen-2.5 is sitting at #7 with an arena ELO of 990. It has participated in 10 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Rodin Gen-2.5?
Rodin Gen-2.5 reports an average generation cost of $0.87 per test with a typical runtime of 6.0 min.
When should I choose Rodin Gen-2.5 over Hi3D 2.1 Split to print?
Rodin Gen-2.5 is ranked #7 (990 ELO) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print currently sits at #6 (991 ELO). Rodin Gen-2.5 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes. Rodin Gen-2.5 wins about 40% of its judged matches overall, compared to 33% for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print. Hi3D 2.1 Split to print often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Rodin Gen-2.5 focuses on fidelity.
