Microsoft's 4B-parameter image-to-3D model producing up to 1536³ resolution PBR textured assets. Uses novel O-Voxel representation that handles arbitrary topology including open surfaces and non-manifold geometry. Generates high-fidelity assets in 3-60 seconds depending on resolution. Fully open source under MIT license.
Arena Rank
#15
Overall ELO
928
Geometry ELO
959
Win Rate
46%
Arena Votes
Total: 622 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.42
Typical runtime: 8.0 min
Curated from neighboring ranks
#14 · 960 ELO
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #15 (928 ELO) while Pixal3D currently sits at #14 (960 ELO).
Pixal3D holds a 32 point advantage, so TRELLIS.2 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
TRELLIS.2 wins about 46% of its judged matches overall, compared to 49% for Pixal3D.
#16 · 846 ELO
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #15 (928 ELO) while Wonder3D currently sits at #16 (846 ELO).
TRELLIS.2 maintains a 82 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
TRELLIS.2 wins about 46% of its judged matches overall, compared to 31% for Wonder3D.
Wonder3D often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
#13 · 987 ELO
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #15 (928 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #13 (987 ELO).
N4D-2.5 holds a 59 point advantage, so TRELLIS.2 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
TRELLIS.2 wins about 46% of its judged matches overall, compared to 47% for N4D-2.5.
#17 · 763 ELO
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #15 (928 ELO) while SAM 3D currently sits at #17 (763 ELO).
TRELLIS.2 maintains a 165 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
TRELLIS.2 wins about 46% of its judged matches overall, compared to 22% for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D often returns meshes quicker (55s) while TRELLIS.2 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for TRELLIS.2?
TRELLIS.2 is sitting at #15 with an arena ELO of 928. It has participated in 622 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with TRELLIS.2?
TRELLIS.2 reports an average generation cost of $0.42 per test with a typical runtime of 8.0 min.
When should I choose TRELLIS.2 over Pixal3D?
TRELLIS.2 is ranked #15 (928 ELO) while Pixal3D currently sits at #14 (960 ELO). Pixal3D holds a 32 point advantage, so TRELLIS.2 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. TRELLIS.2 wins about 46% of its judged matches overall, compared to 49% for Pixal3D.
Follow TRELLIS (Microsoft) on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @MSFTResearch