4K 纹理 · 多边形控制 · 多视角输入 · 拆分为部件 · 图像 · 免费 · API · 商用许可 · ComfyUI
AI 3D领域的先驱之一,质量过硬,UI精致。支持HDR生成、在线雕刻、贴图工具,是最早提供部件生成的平台之一。生态插件可直接在Blender或Unreal Engine中生成模型。基础设施完善,是一个稳健的均衡选择。
Hyper3D (Rodin) · 2 个视频评测
第 1–1 个,共 2 个

AI 3D领域的先驱之一,质量过硬,UI精致。支持HDR生成、在线雕刻、贴图工具,是最早提供部件生成的平台之一。生态插件可直接在Blender或Unreal Engine中生成模型。基础设施完善,是一个稳健的均衡选择。
胜率 60% · 全模式共 654 票
社区评分 · 满分 5 分
社区评分
41 条评分 · 16 条文字评论
Pretty solid overall. The mesh quality is good and exports work smoothly. Sometimes the textures come out a bit flat, but for quick prototyping it's really useful.
Arre, average toh banta hai yaar, koi dhamaka nahi!
Great tool, subscription deals are nice. Doesn't read text very well, most of the time not at all but it's definitely in the top 5
Here the PBR texture still need to be improved.
The model feels stable and reliable in all views
Texture quality is shockingly good. No noise, no weird seams.
Guys, this is really cool. You generate first and only pay credits after confirming, which saves a lot! Partial redo and part split are super useful. Tried many tools and Rodin fits best. Hope textures improve more, excited for Gen 2.5 native texture
The geometry quality is the best! Though I hope they can improve more on PBR.
Met the team at SIGGRAPH this year, they got best paper, very impressive. Rodin Gen-2 gives me way more control than any other 3D AI I've tried. Bang, ControlNet, and partial redo, it's like 3D version of Nano Banana.
Love this platform allows you only pay after you're happy with the result. I can try out different ideas, use redo again and again without worrying about wasting credits.
The best ai tool for split to parts
It’s super quick and lightweight, gives instant results, the textures and mesh look pretty good, the UVs are perfectly aligned, and the model’s nicely low-poly.
This is my third option for AI to mesh. Models look good and lots of option. Textures generated are also good quality. I recommend this if other engines are not producing good results.
Very good split into parts feature
当前赛季的实时表现。已结束的赛季使用已记录的快照。
竞技场排名
#3 / 21
纹理 ELO
1077
几何 ELO
1023
胜率 · 全模式
60%
392 胜 · 262 负
总计:654 票
平均生成费用
$0.29
典型耗时:4.5 min
纹理榜相邻排名
#2 · 1101 ELO
Rodin Gen 2.5 当前排名第 #3(1077 ELO),而 Hi3D v3.0 排名第 #2(1101 ELO)。
Hi3D v3.0 领先 24 分,因此 Rodin Gen 2.5 的支持者往往会聚焦于突出其优势的提示词。
Rodin Gen 2.5 在评判对决中的总胜率约为 60%,而 Hi3D v3.0 为 65%。
Rodin Gen 2.5 的生成速度也更快(4.5 min vs 9.0 min)。
#4 · 1066 ELO
Rodin Gen 2.5 当前排名第 #3(1077 ELO),而 Meshy 7 排名第 #4(1066 ELO)。
Rodin Gen 2.5 领先 11 分,这通常意味着更稳定的社区投票。
Rodin Gen 2.5 在评判对决中的总胜率约为 60%,而 Meshy 7 为 63%。
Rodin Gen 2.5 的生成速度也更快(4.5 min vs 6.9 min)。
#1 · 1101 ELO
Rodin Gen 2.5 当前排名第 #3(1077 ELO),而 Tripo AI v3.1 排名第 #1(1101 ELO)。
Tripo AI v3.1 领先 24 分,因此 Rodin Gen 2.5 的支持者往往会聚焦于突出其优势的提示词。
Rodin Gen 2.5 在评判对决中的总胜率约为 60%,而 Tripo AI v3.1 为 71%。
Tripo AI v3.1 的出图速度更快(1.5 min),而 Rodin Gen 2.5 更注重保真度。
Rodin Gen 2.5 在 Top 3D AI 的当前排名是多少?
Rodin Gen 2.5 目前排名第 #3,竞技场 ELO 为 1077,已参与 654 次社区投票。
使用 Rodin Gen 2.5 生成的费用是多少?
Rodin Gen 2.5 的平均生成费用约为每次 $0.29,典型耗时 4.5 min。
什么时候应该选择 Rodin Gen 2.5 而不是 Hi3D v3.0?
Rodin Gen 2.5 当前排名第 #3(1077 ELO),而 Hi3D v3.0 排名第 #2(1101 ELO)。 Hi3D v3.0 领先 24 分,因此 Rodin Gen 2.5 的支持者往往会聚焦于突出其优势的提示词。 Rodin Gen 2.5 在评判对决中的总胜率约为 60%,而 Hi3D v3.0 为 65%。 Rodin Gen 2.5 的生成速度也更快(4.5 min vs 9.0 min)。