Free · Image · Commercial Use · API · Open Source · Split into Parts
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
SAM 3D (Meta) · 1 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 1
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
13% win rate · 669 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
13 ratings · 3 written reviews
Impressive start for Meta. I like the accuracy of shape, but texture and rest is low in geometry export. And open source is always good for community
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#21 / 21
Textured ELO
755
Geometry ELO
838
Win rate · all modes
13%
84 wins · 585 losses
Total: 669 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.02
Typical runtime: 55s
Nearby ranks in Textured
#20 · 847 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (755 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #20 (847 ELO).
TRELLIS.2 holds a 92 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 13% of its judged matches overall, compared to 28% for TRELLIS.2.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
#19 · 863 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (755 ELO) while Wonder3D currently sits at #19 (863 ELO).
Wonder3D holds a 108 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 13% of its judged matches overall, compared to 22% for Wonder3D.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 4.0 min).
#18 · 925 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (755 ELO) while Pixal3D currently sits at #18 (925 ELO).
Pixal3D holds a 170 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 13% of its judged matches overall, compared to 36% for Pixal3D.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
#17 · 978 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (755 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 currently sits at #17 (978 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 holds a 224 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 13% of its judged matches overall, compared to 42% for Triverse 3.0.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 7.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for SAM 3D?
SAM 3D is sitting at #21 with an arena ELO of 755. It has participated in 669 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with SAM 3D?
SAM 3D reports an average generation cost of $0.02 per test with a typical runtime of 55s.
When should I choose SAM 3D over TRELLIS.2?
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (755 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #20 (847 ELO). TRELLIS.2 holds a 92 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. SAM 3D wins about 13% of its judged matches overall, compared to 28% for TRELLIS.2. SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
