4K Texture · Ultra HD Mesh · Multi-view Input · Free · Commercial Use · API
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
Hi3D · 6 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 6
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Free plan ($0): 100 lifetime credits with limited features and downloads. Plan details
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
52% win rate · 609 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
43 ratings · 14 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#18 / 25
Textured ELO
969
Geometry ELO
1034
Win Rate
44%
364 wins · 466 losses
Total: 830 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.73
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#17 · 972 ELO
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #18 (969 ELO), compared with #17 (972 ELO) for YVO3D 2.0.
YVO3D 2.0 holds a 3 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 44% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for YVO3D 2.0.
YVO3D 2.0 often returns meshes quicker (6.7 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#19 · 964 ELO
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #18 (969 ELO), compared with #19 (964 ELO) for N4D-2.5.
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 5 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 44% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 44% for N4D-2.5.
Hi3D v2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#16 · 980 ELO
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #18 (969 ELO), compared with #16 (980 ELO) for Triverse 3.0.
Triverse 3.0 holds a 11 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 44% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 48% for Triverse 3.0.
#20 · 931 ELO
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #18 (969 ELO), compared with #20 (931 ELO) for VARCO 3D 1.1.
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 38 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 44% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 45% for VARCO 3D 1.1.
VARCO 3D 1.1 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for Hi3D v2.0 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.0 finished at #18 with 969 ELO and 830 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with Hi3D v2.0?
Hi3D v2.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.73 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
How did Hi3D v2.0 compare with YVO3D 2.0 in Jun 26?
In Jun 26, Hi3D v2.0 ranked #18 (969 ELO), compared with #17 (972 ELO) for YVO3D 2.0. YVO3D 2.0 holds a 3 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, Hi3D v2.0 won 44% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for YVO3D 2.0. YVO3D 2.0 often returns meshes quicker (6.7 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
