4K Texture · Ultra HD Mesh · Multi-view Input · Free · Commercial Use · API
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
Hi3D · 6 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 6
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Free plan ($0): 100 lifetime credits with limited features and downloads. Plan details
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
79% win rate · 14 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
43 ratings · 14 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#6 / 7
Segmentation ELO
991
Total votes
6
Win Rate
33%
2 wins · 4 losses
Total: 6 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.75
Typical runtime: 3.0 min
Nearby ranks in Segmentation
#5 · 995 ELO
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #6 (991 ELO) while Roblox CubePart currently sits at #5 (995 ELO).
Roblox CubePart holds a 5 point advantage, so Hi3D 2.1 Split to print fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 33% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for Roblox CubePart.
#7 · 990 ELO
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #6 (991 ELO) while Rodin Gen-2.5 currently sits at #7 (990 ELO).
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 33% of its judged matches overall, compared to 40% for Rodin Gen-2.5.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print also tends to finish generations faster (3.0 min vs 6.0 min).
#4 · 1000 ELO
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #6 (991 ELO) while Tripo Segmentation v2.1 currently sits at #4 (1000 ELO).
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 holds a 10 point advantage, so Hi3D 2.1 Split to print fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 33% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Tripo Segmentation v2.1.
Tripo Segmentation v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print focuses on fidelity.
#3 · 1000 ELO
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #6 (991 ELO) while Meshy 6 Auto Split currently sits at #3 (1000 ELO).
Meshy 6 Auto Split holds a 10 point advantage, so Hi3D 2.1 Split to print fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 33% of its judged matches overall, compared to 50% for Meshy 6 Auto Split.
Meshy 6 Auto Split often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hi3D 2.1 Split to print focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hi3D 2.1 Split to print?
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is sitting at #6 with an arena ELO of 991. It has participated in 6 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hi3D 2.1 Split to print?
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print reports an average generation cost of $0.75 per test with a typical runtime of 3.0 min.
When should I choose Hi3D 2.1 Split to print over Roblox CubePart?
Hi3D 2.1 Split to print is ranked #6 (991 ELO) while Roblox CubePart currently sits at #5 (995 ELO). Roblox CubePart holds a 5 point advantage, so Hi3D 2.1 Split to print fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hi3D 2.1 Split to print wins about 33% of its judged matches overall, compared to 43% for Roblox CubePart.
