4K Texture · Ultra HD Mesh · Multi-view Input · Free · Commercial Use · API
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
Hi3D · 6 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 6
1 article
Articles 1–1 of 1
Free plan ($0): 100 lifetime credits with limited features and downloads. Plan details
Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
52% win rate · 604 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
43 ratings · 14 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#12 / 21
Textured ELO
1013
Geometry ELO
1040
Win rate · all modes
52%
316 wins · 288 losses
Total: 604 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.73
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#11 · 1028 ELO
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #12 (1013 ELO) while VARCO 3D 2.0 currently sits at #11 (1028 ELO).
VARCO 3D 2.0 holds a 15 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D v2.0 wins about 52% of its judged matches overall, compared to 44% for VARCO 3D 2.0.
VARCO 3D 2.0 often returns meshes quicker (2.5 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#13 · 1007 ELO
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #12 (1013 ELO) while Hi3D v2.1 currently sits at #13 (1007 ELO).
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 6 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hi3D v2.0 wins about 52% of its judged matches overall, compared to 53% for Hi3D v2.1.
Hi3D v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#10 · 1031 ELO
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #12 (1013 ELO) while Hunyuan 3D v3.1 currently sits at #10 (1031 ELO).
Hunyuan 3D v3.1 holds a 19 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D v2.0 wins about 52% of its judged matches overall, compared to 59% for Hunyuan 3D v3.1.
Hi3D v2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#14 · 1001 ELO
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #12 (1013 ELO) while Meshy 6 currently sits at #14 (1001 ELO).
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 12 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hi3D v2.0 wins about 52% of its judged matches overall, compared to 52% for Meshy 6.
Meshy 6 often returns meshes quicker (3.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hi3D v2.0?
Hi3D v2.0 is sitting at #12 with an arena ELO of 1013. It has participated in 604 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hi3D v2.0?
Hi3D v2.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.73 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
When should I choose Hi3D v2.0 over VARCO 3D 2.0?
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #12 (1013 ELO) while VARCO 3D 2.0 currently sits at #11 (1028 ELO). VARCO 3D 2.0 holds a 15 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hi3D v2.0 wins about 52% of its judged matches overall, compared to 44% for VARCO 3D 2.0. VARCO 3D 2.0 often returns meshes quicker (2.5 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
