Formerly known as Sparc3D and later Hitem3D, Hi3D entered the market with extremely high-resolution meshes and remains a leader in detailed geometry. Features 1536p Pro resolution and high-quality textures for production-ready assets. If you need the sharpest mesh detail available today, Hi3D is a top contender.
Model Versions (3)
Arena Rank
#10
Overall ELO
1005
Geometry ELO
1036
Win Rate
53%
Arena Votes
Total: 559 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.73
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Curated from neighboring ranks
#9 · 1008 ELO
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #10 (1005 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #9 (1008 ELO).
N4D-2.5 holds a 3 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D v2.0 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 51% for N4D-2.5.
Hi3D v2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#11 · 1005 ELO
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #10 (1005 ELO) while Alpha3D 5 currently sits at #11 (1005 ELO).
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 0 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hi3D v2.0 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 49% for Alpha3D 5.
Alpha3D 5 often returns meshes quicker (1.5 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#8 · 1024 ELO
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #10 (1005 ELO) while Seed3D v2.0 currently sits at #8 (1024 ELO).
Seed3D v2.0 holds a 18 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Hi3D v2.0 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 52% for Seed3D v2.0.
Hi3D v2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#12 · 1003 ELO
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #10 (1005 ELO) while Sloyd AI v3 currently sits at #12 (1003 ELO).
Hi3D v2.0 maintains a 3 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Hi3D v2.0 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 54% for Sloyd AI v3.
Sloyd AI v3 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Hi3D v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Hi3D v2.0?
Hi3D v2.0 is sitting at #10 with an arena ELO of 1005. It has participated in 559 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Hi3D v2.0?
Hi3D v2.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.73 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
When should I choose Hi3D v2.0 over N4D-2.5?
Hi3D v2.0 is ranked #10 (1005 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #9 (1008 ELO). N4D-2.5 holds a 3 point advantage, so Hi3D v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Hi3D v2.0 wins about 53% of its judged matches overall, compared to 51% for N4D-2.5. Hi3D v2.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
Follow Hi3D on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @Hitem3D
